Shel Holtz Discusses Social Media’s Impact on Marketing (Part II)

shel-icon.jpgHere’s part II of our Shel Holtz interview. We left off with Shel discussing consumers increasing lack of tolerance for traditional marketing and the need to incorporate more social media into traditional tactics. You can read part I here. Thanks again, Shel, for a great interview!

BB: So you really see a participation-as-marketing approach, where building community value comes first, than in the traditional forms?

SH: Absolutely. People don’t understand this, but I talk about brand, and people think you are talking about a trademark or a logo, but the brand itself is the way the consumer reacts when they hear your company name or sees your logo or a product of yours on store shelves. That is all based on their experience and the one way, top down, pushed advertising and marketing is only part of that experience.

What always amazes me is how companies spend so much time on how to cut costs in their call centers and customer service and yet the experience you have with a call center or customer service is going to shape a person’s perception of that brand tremendously. One reason I’ve always thought the call center needs to report to PR or communications and not wherever it reports now is because you want to invest in that and make that portion of your business absolutely rock so the experience people have is one where their experience was great and then they tell other people about how that experience was.

You can shape that perception of the brand through engagement in the conversation. For example, I have a blog that is dedicated to my business travel and I only really use it when I’m angry. I’m probably going to be spending half the year on the road and I experience a lot in hotels and airports with airlines and skycaps and the like. I had a bad experience with an off-airport parking service that I use and I blogged it.

The first comment that was posted was by an administrator with that company and she was saying “We really try to be a better company than that. I’m really sorry that you had this experience and I’d like to make it right, can I send you some free parking? If you send me the name of the driver we’ll deal with that.�

That is what I tell people about, not the fact that I spent an hour waiting at the curb at 1 in the morning, which was my original gripe. All I talk about now is, and pardon me for using the “e� word, but they empowered a front office employee who stumbled upon my post to take action about it. I didn’t get the usual corporate drivel from marketing services or whichever department would normally respond to something like that, if anybody responds at all.

I got a real, live human being reaching out to me and saying “We’ll fix this.� That’s terrific. That’s what organizations are going to have to start doing.

BB: How do you see the new trend impacting individual disciplines, such as public relations, as a profession?

SH: It’s already affecting public relations as a profession. If you recognize that people are being influenced by their peers, and more and more of their peers are communicating online, not necessarily on a blog, but a conversation over networks like MySpace. If you look where younger folks, 14-26, are communicating, it’s on MySpace.

It’s not with a formal blog where you are trying to wield influence; it’s just a conversation with your friends. Nevertheless, that’s where influence is taking place. It becomes necessary to engage in some outreach with people you are able to determine are influential; that means reaching out to bloggers, podcasters, or just people who have heavily trafficked social-network profiles. It’s not like reaching out to media, which is crafting a press release and making sure that your wire service hits the right markets. You have to reach out individually.

That’s a whole different ballgame and there are PR agencies, even the world’s largest in Fleishman-Hillard, looking for social media consultants. The agencies are starting to recognize, and some of them have recognized it earlier, that influence isn’t all through the media anymore; with growing regularity its taking place in the social media space. I think you’re also going to see a more rapid uptake of the social media news release-type framework.

There has been some resistance to this idea, but I think some people don’t understand that it’s not the news release that’s social; it’s the content that you want to get into the hands of bloggers, podcasters and people who write in online journalism venues. You’re looking to provide the content to them in a format that they would want to use, where they don’t have to struggle with it and sort of hammer it into the social media context that they want to put it in. Hewlett-Packard recently put out a social media news release and I thought that was remarkable.

BB: How do you see social media impacting the way brand managers do their job?

SH: I guess that depends on what a particular brand manager does within an organization. But I think people who are responsible for the brand are going to have to be aware about what is already being said about them out there in that space. In a lot of ways this is really traditional communications.

You identify where the pockets of conversation are going on, and then you can classify that communication as positive, neutral, or negative. This is just good, old-fashioned, content analysis. Then you have to figure out what you are going to do about it in terms of the existing perceptions of the brand.

You also have to address any new initiatives that you have; new product launches or campaigns. Through the initial research that you have done you’ll know who is likely to talk about that, and do it in a way that doesn’t make some people inclined to change the conversation as to how clueless you were in the approach you took to reaching out to the social media.

Right now, for example, there is a lot of chatter going on in the blogosphere about Nikon giving a whole bunch of bloggers cameras and how that was simply blogger bribery. I guarantee you that’s not the conversation Nikon wanted.

BB: A lot of what is happening can be very intimidating to a company looking at social media, seeing all this volatility. What would you tell a company that knows it has to get involved in social media, but sees this and doesn’t really have an idea as to how to approach it?

SH: I would counsel these organizations not to be taken in by a lot of the negativity they are going to read about in the media. The media thrives on uncertainty and doubt so they tend to report on all the negative items. There is a tremendous advantage to be gained through effective use of social media. I would start by listening. I would counsel the company to spend a fair amount of time listening to what’s being said before jumping in.

If you are going to start commenting on blogs, read a lot of comments and what happens in the comment stream and how people react. If you are going to blog, look at the blogs of your competitors, or ones that have a reputation for getting it right.

Just spend a lot of time absorbing how the conversation works in general especially in whatever corner of the blogosphere you are going to be operating in, I would say 90 days isn’t an unreasonable amount of time to spend really just soaking it all in. It will make things just that much more natural figuring out how you are going to play in that space if you’re up to speed on the conversation that is already out there.

BB:How much of this is really social media, versus understanding who your community is and really getting to know them better?

SH: I’m getting to the point where I believe social media is really just integrated with everything else. By getting to understand your community, you’ll understand what realm of social media they are engaged in and what space outside of social media they are engaged in. If you are thinking about creating a positive brand experience you are going to want any encounter they have with your brand to be positive.

That’s whether it’s in-store, with a customer service representative, or online, and increasingly the online space is being dominated by social media. It really is understanding your community. If your community isn’t online then you get to pay attention to this a whole lot less. In rural towns where 60% of the population or so don’t have access to computers, if the mayor simply blogs about a new parking ordinance a lot of people will be getting parking tickets.

A company needs to ask itself, if they decide their community is active in the social media environment and that they will pursue a social media program, what topics they should be chiming in on, who are the important people they need to reach, should they be initiating the conversation or jumping into existing ones, and who should be representing the company. All kinds of different answers will become evident if you know the audience that you are trying to reach.

 

Social Media’s Wide Open Future

I’m stuck at Midway for a long delay, which means I’m thinking (thanks, Toby, for the shout out). So here’s a bonus post! Before I begin, let me say the best technology purchase I’ve made in years is this EVDO-RevA broadband access card. 2 MBPs anytime, anywhere! Love it!!!!!

(9:53 CST: Airport Update – A woman just watched the birth of her grandchild on my laptop. Airports can be pretty cool places.)

keynotes.jpgI had the great fortune of spending a couple of days at NXTcomm blogging. There I saw Cisco CEO John Chambers; Motorola CEO Ed Zander; GE’s lead executive for NBC Universal, Vice Chairman Bob Wright; as well as Verizon and AT&T’s CEOs explain their social media strategies and hopes to the telecom industry. The reality behind telecom and technology is that these many voices – handsets, infrastructure, network providers and content creators – are all in the same boat. They don’t know what’s coming next, but they do know that we’re at the tip of the iceberg.

The facts are simple. Social media has been fueled by a dynamic, increasingly open application environment (thanks to the widespread adoption of application programming interfaces or APIs), the open source ethos, and incredible amounts of bandwidth. More than 50 percent of Americans have broadband technology, and suddenly they can stream audio and video, upload massive photo albums, create dynamic content, and share it with social networks. Empowered with this dynamic content, users have taken control of which applications work, when, where and how.

All of the traditional powerhouses have lost control of content consumption, and increasingly its generation. In many ways the traditional technology and media companies’ role is to simply facilitate the optimal media experience for consumers and businesses alike. This means lots of bandwidth for full access to any media form and open development platforms with full access, anywhere any time. Users increasingly demand diverse media usage across devices (handsets, PDAs and laptops to TVs and PCs), and industries are scrambling to enable it.

To meet the anything, anytime, anywhere future all parts of the media and technology industries need dramatic increases in the amount of bandwidth available to drive media usage (minimum targets of 1 GB by 2010, according to Verizon CEO Ivan Seidenberg), the availability of this bandwidth in diverse mobile geographies, increased functionality and openness of content devices, and finally open application environments and standards so further social media innovation will occur… And prosper.

In 2010, it’s anticipated that 20 users in one night will download and upload more content on the Internet than the entire country did in 1995 (a cute Chambers stat). Think about that.

So what does that mean for marketers? For one thing, the participation is marketing principles outlined in this book will accelerate dramatically with increased bandwidth, functionality and applications.

The realities of today’s environment is that 50 percent broadband penetration at 500kbps to 2 Mbps has barely made user generated video the new hot application for Americans. Imagine what four more years of technological and social media application development combined with a 5000 percent increase in bandwidth will do. Not just at the home, but on ubiquitous wireless networks throughout the world.

Wow. Wireless. Location-based content. Video. And what else? Get ready for the ride because marketing’s going to change even more. I’m excited.

 

Goodness Gracious, Great Blogs of Fire!

blogoffirelarger.jpgAnother week, another edition of Great Blogs of Fire.

Here’s an interesting one. Perhaps like me, you’ve been super jazzed about Facebook’s network application integration feature. This news opened the power of Facebook’s network to marketers in a way that enables us to access users by creating valuable applications for them. Social media strategy at its best. But the Bivings report says that network application fatigue may set in, and that fund-raising applications are failing. It seems to me that Bivings Writer Erin Teeling hit the nail on the head with this statement, “…it’s also a question whether people are ready to give money and/or be sold to through the social network.” A social media law or axiom that we believe in: Participation and value building works, but exploitation and selling always fails. And thus another round of social media failures appear to be on the way.

I’ve been thumbing through David Meerman Scott’s book the New Rules of Marketing & PR (I actually cite it a few times in my forthcoming book), and was thinking about writing a review. I don’t need to now. Richard Becker wrote a comprehensive and thorough review on Monday. As far as I am considered, “Me, too!” I endorse the book as a great social media promo emersion exercise.

A great article in the Blog Herald on Open Source marketing. Now how’s that for a concept? Imagine marketers coming together in a wiki environment to build great marketing campaigns. Valeria Maltoni is already doing it via BrandingWire and discusses the results in the Herald piece.

I am not sure if you know about the crayon agency. But it houses many of the leading minds in social media, including this week’s interview subject Shel Holtz and Coca Cola Virtual Thirst lead C.C. Chapman. For an inside look at Crayon, look at Joe Jaffe’s welcome of Greg Verdino to the team.

A great time was had last night at the Pulver Party. Yours truly shot the pics.

Finally, our local blog featured this week is Catch Up Lady. She’s blogging about passive aggressive notes and such. For a good laugh, check this one out.

 

Shel Holtz Discusses Social Media’s Impact on Marketing (Part I)

shel-icon.jpgI usually like to write an introduction for our interviewees. Shel Holtz doesn’t need one. We’re honored to have him on the Bin. Without further ado, Part I of our interview with Shel Holtz (part II coming on Thursday).

BB: Tell us about your book and what it is going to do for marketers and everyone on the Internet.

SH: It’s being published by McGraw-Hill and is part of their How to Do Everything series and it’s called How to Do Everything with Podcasting. I co-authored it with Neville Hobson who’s the co-host of the twice-weekly podcast that I do called For Immediate Release, which is actually a series of podcasts Neville and I do.

Twice a week we produce The Hobson and Holtz Report, the cornerstone of For Immediate Release, which is a look at public relations as it’s affected by social media and online communications. (For Immediate Release also includes interviews, book reviews, and recordings of speeches and panel discussions.) Neville and I were approached, and for about a year we have been working on this book that is just as the title says, how to do everything with podcasting. It’s a little longer than most of the podcasting books you’ll see because we cover things like how to use a podcast as a business tool or employee communications tool or marketing tool in addition to all the technical information that’s included; really podcasting A to Z.

It’s going on sale on the 15th, and should be available just about everywhere. In fact, last time I was at a Barnes and Noble I saw a whole rack of How to Do Everything books in their computer section so I’m looking forward to seeing it there, as well as all the usual places like Amazon.com and BarnesandNoble.com.

BB: Where do you think social media is taking marketing in general? We all know it is the latest trend within marketing, but how is affecting the marketing discipline as a whole?

SH: I think it is affecting it greatly and it will continue to. I resist the notion that you have to put all your eggs in this basket because there still are a lot of people that are not engaging in social media. But, depending on the kind of market you’re in, and in a lot of respects, regardless of the market you’re in, people ignore it at their peril.

What’s changing is the idea of who is in control of the message. Most marketers, for a long time, have had the luxury of delivering a message one way, top down, and they knew that people were going to listen and some were going to be influenced by what they saw or what they heard. There weren’t a lot of ways you could go about vetting information that was offered to you.

For example, if you look at a typical T.V commercial for a new car it will show the vehicle driving sideways in an inch of water throwing up this beautiful spray that the light is catching just right and at the end of the commercial you get about one-tenth of a second of very small type, and a lot of it. People would say, “Wow. I want that car. That’s glorious. I want my car to look like that when I’m driving down the street.� But you didn’t know, until you got a TiVo, that if you freeze frame that legal type at the end, you can’t make your car look like this.

It’s done on a closed track with professional drivers wearing 5-point harnesses and parts of the car had been removed to make room for other things, and the disclaimer informs you that you shouldn’t try this on the street. Marketing, in a lot of regards, was slick presentations that were designed to pull the wool over the consumer’s eyes.

Today you *can* freeze frame on TiVo so you can see exactly what that legal disclaimer says. You can then capture it and put it up on the web for everyone to see and people can talk about it to each other. This is what social media is all about; people talking to each other. We have seen fewer and fewer organizations able to continue to hold the public’s trust as trust shifts to the peer space.

The reason the trust is shifting is because the original sources of information, business, mainstream media, and government have egregiously violated that trust on a number of occasions in the past several years. Who people trust is people like themselves; they are able to reach out to those kinds of people with greater ease and with a larger pool thanks to social media.

Whether that’s a blog, or a social network, or a wiki, if there’s someone like you who says “I saw this movie. It sucked.� Or “I have this car and you don’t want the maintenance troubles I’ve had. Don’t buy this car.� That’s where you are going to look for the information to help you make a decision, as opposed to being influenced by the slick TV commercials or the traditional one way, top down marketing. That doesn’t mean there’s no room for commercials or traditional marketing, but I think it does mean that it has to be balanced and integrated with social media involvement.

BB: Will consumers and buyers be less tolerant of traditional media tactics, and will traditional tactics have to evolve to incorporate the same tone? In essence, will an ad-campaign have to possess social media aspects and be conversational in tone?

SH: I think there’s going to have to be some sort of a social media dimension to a lot of the advertising that goes on out there and you’re starting to see some of this. T.V. commercials now invite you to submit content, for example, or go to a site where you are going to find a greater level of interactivity or involvement with the audience, or what Jay Rosen calls “the people formally known as the audience.�

So in essence, I definitely think that is the case. It will always depend on the nature of the advertisement. If I thought about it, I could probably pull out an advertiser or commercial where that kind of interaction isn’t needed. But by and large I think organizations are going to have to stop and think about the fact that any commercial you broadcast can be copied, uploaded to YouTube, and commented on.

In addition, people are going to make their own commercials. This has been happening over the last couple of weeks with the Apple iPhone. The writer of the Brand New Day blog for BusinessWeek said that he saw this commercial and he thought it was from the advertising agency for the iPhone, but then somebody e-mailed him and said “No, no. This is just a fan who made this commercial.� So there is this consumer generated content, and companies that are smart enough to figure out that you can get your fans to create this stuff for you.

Southwest Airlines, for example, is one of the companies that has had a contest inviting people to submit a video. They had to be 20-seconds in length, and oriented to be one of those “Want to get away?� commercials. The winner would be produced as a national advertising spot. The videos could be uploaded and commented on, and the winning entry, which is pretty funny and very well produced, is going to be one of their regular national spots. They started with social media on the front end and it ends up being a regular, old TV commercial.

It doesn’t matter which way you go, as long as you are out there engaging in that conversation at some level.

You can read Part II here.

 

Our Blog Carts at NXTcomm

blogsquad.jpg

I’m on the left with my cart, Einstein; Ian has Newton. See actual posts at blog.tiaonline.org. My poor wife.

 

Saying 2.0’s a Major No-No

stopsigncanadagander.jpgStop, please. The cliche has gotten out of hand. The moniker 2.0’s become an absolute joke that does not mean anything anymore. A Google Blog search conducted yesterday (June 17) on “2.0″ for the past week pulled 93,028 posts. I read 2.0 and pause right there to debate whether or not to bail on the post, marketing collateral, story or whatever it is.

Here are this week’s examples:

Maybe you can get away with it when you’re an established 2.0 brand such as Business 2.0 or the like. These folks were 2.0 when 2.0 was legit! Right, Business 2.0 (est. circa late last century, boys and girls)? But anything new (a la Jan. 1, 2007 and beyond) should never be monikered 2.0.

I would never counsel a client to put 2.0 at the end of a product, service or company name. It seems to me we are in the waning stage of a fad, similar to names that began with an e (a la eHarmony), an X (a la X-Box), .com (Pets.com), etc. To dub something “2.0″ now is bad PR, branding, marketing, or whatever else you want to call it.

“Webolution” (thank you, Michael Pranikoff for this coined word) is a process that will continue to develop, and move beyond current conceptions. Technological change will further impact us. What are they going to call the localized craze that’s sure to follow the GIS-induced geographic tie -into everything user generated? It’s best to create a brand name that meets the product’s value proposition to its community… as opposed to a cliche that’s stuck in a moment. Otherwise you’ll get hit with tens of thousands in re-branding costs.

Geoff is guestblogging this week at NXTcomm. You can read his posts at blog.tiaonline.org.

 

Battle of the Brands: NASCAR vs. AT&T

nascar-attx.jpgOn a hot Sunday afternoon in Atlanta NASCAR quietly filed a $100 Million Dollar countersuit against AT&T for what they cite as “ambush marketing.”

Maybe this is karma coming around to bite AT&T in the *ss after the stunt they pulled with RIAA & MPAA to track down and prosecute any AT&T user that downloads pirated music and movies. Dave Winer posts an astute observation of AT&T’s “lack of awareness with their customers” and why, in his opinion, AT&T deserves the death penalty for being the “only ISP that will send you to jail to create a new business model for them.”

NASCAR’s biggest beef is that AT&T’s rebranding interferes with their elite series sponsor – Nextel. If successful, the suit will prohibit AT&T from participating in sponsorship of any car in 2008.

Way to go AT&T. What will you screw up next?

 

Looking for Help Via Social Networks

Last week I joined Facebook and MyRagan, updated my LinkedIn profile and registered for the Digital Media Conference.

Although working in Communications for the last 10 years, this is a whole new realm. The social networks are intriguing. Even the DMC created an online community prior to its event next week. They sent out a link as to how to go in there and meet other attendees, speakers, etc. It’s crazy to me, but fascinating at the same time.

So far, MyRagan, a place for Communications professionals, has been the most helpful. As a former reporter, which is an advantage when placing pitch calls, I talk their language. Still, after placing a bunch of calls yesterday on a great story a few of the writers/editors were downright rude. It’s hard not to take it personally. These tips on MyRagan about ways to make reporters happy were helpful. Although many of them are a given, a refresher never hurt anyone:

• Make things easy for them [the easier things are for them, the better coverage you’ll receive]

• Don’t exaggerate or generalize [don’t talk in jargon and assume the reporter knows what you mean; don’t be evasive; if you don’t know the answer to a question, say so]

• Keep your promises [don’t promise what you can’t deliver]

• Know who is helping whom [if you cooperate with reporters on the stories they want to do, it’s easier to get them to do stories you want done]

• Don’t tell one reporter what another reporter is doing [let reporters keep their scoop before telling others]

• There’s no such thing as ‘off the record’ [if you can’t keep a secret, don’t expect a reporter to keep it]

When just trying to get that story out there, these tips are good to remember. The relationship between a PR professional and a reporter can be advantageous, as long as you appreciate your audience.

 

Social Media Nouveaux Answers from Toby Bloomberg

speakernmn.bmpShe was our first interview on the Buzz Bin. When it came to do research for Now Is Gone, Toby Bloomberg was one of the few resources I reached out to for primary research. Her Diva Marketing Blog is always top ranked, and she is one of the kindest, most accessible blogers out there. Read her answers to questions for “Now Is Gone”in this week’s spotlight interview. And if you really like what Toby has to say, catch her at the New Media Nouveaux conference this July 13 in Tysons Corner.

BB: Suddenly many corporate marketers are approaching social media as a new way to reach their target audiences. What do you think of this?

TB: I think it’s a terrific idea. Companies who step into social media now will be perceived as innovators. The big benefit is they’ll have a head start on the “learnings� which will leap frog them over their competitors.

BB: Why are so many businesses running towards new media?

TB: The “so many� at this point is a relative term. For those organizations (non profit, for profit, government) that think they have missed the virtual boat, it is moving out of dry dock; There is no need for swimming yet but it is quickly picking up speed.

As to why the interest, organizations are realizing that many of their customers are hanging out on blogs, in mash-up communities, on video sites, on gaming sites. Just like in the traditional world of media, marketers want to have a presence where their customers are likely to be.

For marketers who are early adopters it’s cool to be seen in 3-D worlds like Second Life. Smart business people understand that new media offers multiple benefits from enhanced search engine optimization, to new tools to obtain customer feedback and additional value-add content. Where social media really shines is creating relationships which are the first steps to customer acquisition and the reinforcement of customer retention.

However, social media is more than a passive website strategy. The most beneficial aspect is the ability to engage directly with customers and other stakeholders. Social media opens the doors for businesses to listen to the unfiltered voices of their customers and to track those conversations. Social media also provides opportunities for the people within the company join in on those conversations and talk directly to customers. Taking an active role in creating a dialogue with customers about issues that they care about, at the moment in time when they care about those concerns, is the heart of new media marketing.

BB: What do you think of the terminology “target audience� versus “community?�

TB: Very interesting question. It seems to me that although the concepts are not mutually exclusive, the ideas you present are part of a process. You would first identify your target audience and understand their needs. Next would come building community as a strategy to fulfill those needs. Keep in mind that not all of your target audience will want to join your “community.� To go beyond what has become a buzz word, building community takes continuous effort and resources which reverts back to marketing planning and delivering against your brand promise.

BB: What will happen to marketers who try to exploit social networks?

TB: I’ll respond with a typical marketer’s answer, “It depends.� It depends how you define “exploit� in terms of adding benefit to the network. A good example from the healthcare blogoshere is a closed social networking community of physicians. The free community allows only physicians who can be confirmed against a data base of certified doctors to can gain access.

However, it allows paid sponsors the privilege of actively participating in the conversations that take place within the guarded walls of the community. Would you call this exploitation of a social networking community? Some would but the members must perceive value because the community is growing rapidly.

BB: What are your thoughts of the concept “participation is marketing?�

TB: I love the concept. It adds an important dimension to an expanding, complex marketing tool bag. Sometimes it’s nice to reach for a paper sales sheet with just the facts. It’s also nice to know that there is an online communication resource: a bulletin board, blog, wiki, vlog, podcast, where additional information can be found including peer-to-peer feedback and a way to engage with the people in the company too.

BB: How about the latest trend of traditional press releases evolving towards a social media releases?

TB: Since the technology is available to include mixed media, video, links, photos, etc, why not capitalize on providing robust information in one place? What tends to frustrate me is the written information is sometimes too brief. The format leaves it up to the recipient to pieces the elements of the story together. Sometimes I don’t have time or want to watch a video or listen to a podcast. Nor do I want to think too hard. I want the story to be told and then I’ll take it and modify it for my readers.

I want it all. Available links, multi media and the story pulled together along with the facts separated out.

BB: What’s the best thing a business can do if it’s considering entering the blogging or social media world?

TB: Understanding the culture. Blogging/social media is unlike any other marketing strategy I’ve seen. Since it is built on a culture that incorporates community. As with any community there are social norms that new comers must be aware of. Informal checks and balances are in-place and if you color out side of the lines the blogosphere is not shy about letting you know.

Frequently that slap on the hand is not contained within the confines of a few blog posts but is picked up by mainstream media. The impact to the goodwill of the brand or business may be significant. The most critical aspects to keep top of mind are: honesty, transparency, authenticity.

The next step, after understanding the culture, is to give social media the respect of any valid marketing strategy. Set goals and objectives that relate back to business outcomes. How to measure the success of a social media strategy may be different than those of traditional marketing, however to gain credibility we can not be afraid to overlay accountability on social media tactics.

Then build strategies that support the brand while maintaining the authenticity of the conversation.

 

Goodness Gracious, Great Blogs of Fire!

blogoffirelarger.jpgSome great posts on the ‘net this week. Let’s start with Scott Monty who writes about the best possible creator of User Generated Content. And it may be the person next to you… even if it is the secretary. The Social Media Marketing blog is worth a read in its own right.

I try not to link up the mega blogs, but I couldn’t help myself this time. Micro Persuasion Author Steve Rubel writes about the need to provide businesses the ability to be imperfect. Beta business. You mean we can make mistakes? Companies can be human. A superior post.

Brains on Fire Author Spike distinguishes the best corporate blogs from the me, toos. “If you don’t know much about Patagonia, you should read ‘Let My People Go Surfing,’ written by their fearless leader, Yvon Chouinard, for some background. And if you’ve ever received a Patagonia catalog or been in one of their retail stores, then you at least know that they are not only about a love of the outdoors, but about corporate and environmental responsibility – in a huge way. And their blog does nothing but reinforce their beliefs.” Another good case study for those still in the balance.

We also try to feature a blog in DC. How about a blogger visiting DC? The Flack Peter Himler came to DC for the Bulldog conference (Local flacks like me see so many other flacks in DC that we try to avoid mass flacking events a la Bulldog.). Interesting notes on what reporters actually use and don’t use for sources.

BrandTarot put together every (Aggh, I can’t believe I am going to right this horrific word… ) Web 2.0 company logo possible. Cool or scary? Personally, I subscribe to the thought that every time someone says Web 2.0 (Ooow! That’s twice!) a start-up dies.