The decision has been made, and a little earlier than expected. Specifically, it’s time to fulfill the promise to cut a social network from my regular repertoire.
There are too many of them. With a business to run, a book to promote, and a life to maintain, balance required a change. There have been many entries about the social networks, and the corresponding fatigue they can cause, etc. No one summed it up better than Valeria Maltoni in her great article, “Facebook ain’t about Face time.”
The surprise is that I’m keeping both microblogging profiles, Twitter and Pownce.
Why? Pownce is an absolute blast with great conversations. And Twitter really seams to be the pooling place for communication bloggers. Further, since adding a Twitter badge to the blog Twitter readership has doubled.
Why Cut MyRagan?
In the end it came down to statistics. In the past month, Google Analytics reveals that the Buzz Bin has received 209 visits from Pownce, 68 visits from Twitter and 4 visits from MyRagan. We did receive over a hundred visits from a Shel Holtz mention in the Ragan eNewstand; however, this is a separate entity from MyRagan.
This type of traffic clearly reveals which communities value my participation and time. The decision was easy. A contributing factor made it happen sooner than the promised end of the month.
The Contributing Factor
Originally, this decision was not going to be made until the end of the month. However, Rich Becker and I were trying to launch a forum on MyRagan to help new bloggers get their legs. After getting sign-off from Mark Ragan, we suddenly could not get the forum launched… And there was not a straight answer on why the forum was stalled.
In the time that we got the forum approved by Mark, MyRagan instituted a new approval policy. Unlike other social networks like Facebook, MyRagan has closed forum development, requiring interested users to suggest a new discussion topics to MyRagan management. In essence, they are controlling which discussions can occur…
Controlling content directly contradicts the spirit of social media. Further, who are the judges of what content should be discussed? I would like to know who is so qualified to determine what kind of conversations should occur in a social network.
This is not the first time MyRagan has come under fire for controlling content. Mark Ragan specifically got drawn into a very public incident with the Social Media Club. The control issue plus, to be frank, this incident annoyed me after all of the effort put into the concept. So the decision was hastened.
That being said, when Mark saw my premature Twitter post intending to “ax MyRagan” (nice word choice on my part – head slap), he said in return, “Interesting comment, Geoff. Only I can ax MyRagan. And why would I? It’s more successful than I ever dreamed possible.”
MyRagan is a great concept for communicators. It should experience continued success, and perhaps in the future it’ll make sense to participate. After all, we must continue to Think Liquid. But for that to happen, MyRagan will need to loosen it’s hold on content and community development. In the interim, Rich and I intend to launch the effort publicly on the Internet soon. More details are forthcoming.
One Footnote
Much hub-bub about Facebook and LinkedIn. I have profiles on both (hyper-linked) if you want to “friend” me… I’m not sure how excited to get about either of these networks as they seem to be glorified contact managers with bulletin boards. Of the two, Facebook is more robust. I am always open to participation and conversation on either network.
Don Draper Decreed It: The Whiskey Trend Is Here To Stay (Even If It Is Cherry-Flavored):
Follow the yellow brick road: Hospitals in search of the Wizard:
25 Signs You've Got a Strong SM Consultant or Agency:
Branding Lessons from the “Sweetest” Wine on the Shelf:
The Second Screen: Moving Beyond Twitter:
5 Wine Blogs for 2012: