<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Fake Steve Jobs Bugs Me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crttbuzzbin.com/2007/08/10/the-fake-steve-jobs-bugs-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crttbuzzbin.com/2007/08/10/the-fake-steve-jobs-bugs-me/</link>
	<description>Musings and analysis on marketing, buzz and communications.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:07:22 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ATPM 13.09 - Bloggable: Our Sense of Childlike Wonder</title>
		<link>http://www.crttbuzzbin.com/2007/08/10/the-fake-steve-jobs-bugs-me/comment-page-1/#comment-7331</link>
		<dc:creator>ATPM 13.09 - Bloggable: Our Sense of Childlike Wonder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 12:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/blog/2007/08/10/the-fake-steve-jobs-bugs-me/#comment-7331</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] good one. But what does that say about bloggers, much less journalistic bloggers. I think they get carried away with the anonymity. It&#8217;s easier to say what&#8217;s on your mind behind a computer screen, especially when [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://www.crttbuzzbin.com/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] good one. But what does that say about bloggers, much less journalistic bloggers. I think they get carried away with the anonymity. It&rsquo;s easier to say what&rsquo;s on your mind behind a computer screen, especially when [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele</title>
		<link>http://www.crttbuzzbin.com/2007/08/10/the-fake-steve-jobs-bugs-me/comment-page-1/#comment-5196</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/blog/2007/08/10/the-fake-steve-jobs-bugs-me/#comment-5196</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jennifer. And your last statement ... I couldn&#039;t have said it better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jennifer. And your last statement &#8230; I couldn&#8217;t have said it better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele</title>
		<link>http://www.crttbuzzbin.com/2007/08/10/the-fake-steve-jobs-bugs-me/comment-page-1/#comment-5195</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/blog/2007/08/10/the-fake-steve-jobs-bugs-me/#comment-5195</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comments. Journalists do cover bloggers. I know one reporter who reads 10 various blogs to see &quot;what&#039;s going on&quot; in their industry before delving in. We&#039;re making their jobs easier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments. Journalists do cover bloggers. I know one reporter who reads 10 various blogs to see &#8220;what&#8217;s going on&#8221; in their industry before delving in. We&#8217;re making their jobs easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Goodman Horowitz</title>
		<link>http://www.crttbuzzbin.com/2007/08/10/the-fake-steve-jobs-bugs-me/comment-page-1/#comment-5121</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Goodman Horowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/blog/2007/08/10/the-fake-steve-jobs-bugs-me/#comment-5121</guid>
		<description>The Rupert Murdoch quote was rich.  He delayed doing business with a newspaper that didn&#039;t paint a pretty picture of him in its coverage.  This pretty well captures his idea of what journalism is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Rupert Murdoch quote was rich.  He delayed doing business with a newspaper that didn&#8217;t paint a pretty picture of him in its coverage.  This pretty well captures his idea of what journalism is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Becker</title>
		<link>http://www.crttbuzzbin.com/2007/08/10/the-fake-steve-jobs-bugs-me/comment-page-1/#comment-5077</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Becker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/blog/2007/08/10/the-fake-steve-jobs-bugs-me/#comment-5077</guid>
		<description>Right on Michele. I think it could be as easy as it used to be. 

If journalists (television excluded because that it is different topic all together) just did what they used to do best ... report the news, find the truth, and realize that the moniker &quot;blogger&quot; doesn&#039;t mean as much as the person behind the blog, they might find social media sourcing them more often than they source social media. The reason the media is picking up on blog stories or worse, creating the news like the fake Steve Jobs blog, is because they have lost their way. Bloggers, in some cases, are starting to cover what people want to read â€” often the stuff that today&#039;s media has no interest in covering anymore.

Best, Rich</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on Michele. I think it could be as easy as it used to be. </p>
<p>If journalists (television excluded because that it is different topic all together) just did what they used to do best &#8230; report the news, find the truth, and realize that the moniker &#8220;blogger&#8221; doesn&#8217;t mean as much as the person behind the blog, they might find social media sourcing them more often than they source social media. The reason the media is picking up on blog stories or worse, creating the news like the fake Steve Jobs blog, is because they have lost their way. Bloggers, in some cases, are starting to cover what people want to read â€” often the stuff that today&#8217;s media has no interest in covering anymore.</p>
<p>Best, Rich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simplykyle</title>
		<link>http://www.crttbuzzbin.com/2007/08/10/the-fake-steve-jobs-bugs-me/comment-page-1/#comment-4941</link>
		<dc:creator>simplykyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 21:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/blog/2007/08/10/the-fake-steve-jobs-bugs-me/#comment-4941</guid>
		<description>I loved your comment after the Rupert Murdoch quote, &#039;Well...&#039;. Haha! About journalists covering bloggers, I think that is the silliest thing these news organizations are doing. That&#039;s not making much sense to me. Whoever calls the shots, probably some very much older people (no offense to anyone in particular), but they have misinterpreted &quot;blog boom&quot;. It should only be used a secondary resource and never a primary. And what I mean by that is whenever CNN, FOX, ABC, etc need to verify statements or a situation that a issue then they should look at the company blog or individual&#039;s blog to see if they can connect the dots for a fuller story.

The extended coverage TV media has given blogs is ridiculous to me. It has been absolutely misinterpreted by a couple people at the top of these news organizations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved your comment after the Rupert Murdoch quote, &#8216;Well&#8230;&#8217;. Haha! About journalists covering bloggers, I think that is the silliest thing these news organizations are doing. That&#8217;s not making much sense to me. Whoever calls the shots, probably some very much older people (no offense to anyone in particular), but they have misinterpreted &#8220;blog boom&#8221;. It should only be used a secondary resource and never a primary. And what I mean by that is whenever CNN, FOX, ABC, etc need to verify statements or a situation that a issue then they should look at the company blog or individual&#8217;s blog to see if they can connect the dots for a fuller story.</p>
<p>The extended coverage TV media has given blogs is ridiculous to me. It has been absolutely misinterpreted by a couple people at the top of these news organizations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

