OUR EXPERTISE:

Social Media Communicators Don’t Read Cluetrain

“There’s no market for messages”

One thing has become readily apparent to me: Most social media communicators, “personal brands” (snort) and social media experts have neglected to read the Cluetrain Manifesto. Whether you agree with the principles in this book or not, in my mind it should be mandatory reading for anyone who conducts business communications on the Internet.

cluetrain.jpg

Many a social media consultant or online communicator have confided in me that they have not read the Cluetrain Manifesto. To me that’s as unforgivable as practicing law without a J.D. or practicing medicine without going to medical school and internships.

Cluetrain captures the essence of the uncontrolled business environment and they need to provide authentic, real dialogue based around the market’s needs. Without understand the fundamental dynamics of the social media form and the inherently uncontrived conversations it inspires, communicators are lost in the darkness.

At bare minimum communicators should read the opening salvo of 95 theses that comprise the Cluetrain Manifesto, Christopher Locke‘s chapter, “Internet Apocalypso, and Doc Searls and David Weinberger‘s contribution, “Markets Are Conversations.”

It get backs to community concepts which are at the heart of Now Is Gone. In many ways, Now Is Gone is the direct product of the Internet and Cluetrain’s unrelenting view that controlled and contrived business brand messages — personal or corporate — have no place on the Internet. Consider the boiled down thesis of the book and its seven principles of community development.

For me Cluetrain represents a great hope: That business can be done differently. The Internet and social media can become the elixir to revolutionize our corporate cultures of exploitation, and refocus it on social good, causes, and service to actual markets.

One of the reasons the whole personal branding movement disturbs me is that most personal branders are in actuality exploiting these tools to foster a new conversational, self-centered hucksterism that makes me sick. It’s not genuine or real, and I don’t want any part of it. Add your genuine personality to the conversation, not a contrived self image.

Here are my favorite 10 of the 95 theses from Cluetrain:

3) Conversations among human beings sound human. They are conducted in a human voice.

25) Companies need to come down from their Ivory Towers and talk to the people with whom they hope to create relationships.

26) Public relations does not relate to the public. Companies are deeply afraid of their markets.

33) Learning to speak with a human voice is not a parlor trick. It can’t be “picked up” at some tony conference.

34) To speak in a human voice, companies must share the concerns of their communities.

35) But first they must belong to a community.

61) Sadly, the part of the company a networked market wants to talk to is usually hidden behind a smokescreen of hucksterism, of language that rings false — and often is.

62) marketers do not want to talk to flacks and hucksters. They want to participate in the conversations going on behind the corporate firewall.

83) We want you to take 50 million of us as seriously as you take one reporter from THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

91) Our allegiance is to ourselves — our friends, our new allies and acquaintances, even our sparring partners. Companies that have no part in this world, also have no future.

Bookmark and Share
 

Buzz Meter: OneRiot

clip_image002 Is it possible for one search engine to determine the “pulse of the web?” OneRiot, formerly known as Me.dium, is not your typical search engine. What differentiates OneRiot with other search engines is their method of presenting information. OneRiot prioritizes the current popular information, making their search results “relevant, fresh, friendly and pulsing with the real-time energy of the web.”

OneRiot determines the popularity of the search using pulse indicators. If the search results are something the community is excited about, either of the three pulse indicator images shown below will be next to the results:

  • clip_image004Emerging
  • clip_image006Surging
  • clip_image008Raging

To search for the most popular web content, all you have to do is download OneRiot’s toolbar. The toolbar, once known as the Pulsechecker, can be found at the bottom right corner of your webpages. It is compatible with Internet Explorer and Firefox. For customer service and support or for general questions, visit OneRiot’s Satisfaction page.

I decided to test what I felt was yesterday’s buzzword: TwitterRank. OneRiot listed 94 search results for the buzzword and none of the results had the pulse indicators. What does that mean? TwitterRank was yesterday’s news.

I then tested the social search engine for our President-Elect Obama and found 66,802,000 search results. Three of the results had “Raging” pulse indicators. What does that mean? Those three articles on Obama are so far the most popular for the day.

Buzz Meter Ranking: 3 out of 4 Buzz Bees

clip_image009clip_image009[1]clip_image009[2]

Positive: OneRiot is a fun tool to use and search for popular web content. I do enjoy the simplicity of the tool and the layout. The pulse indicators are useful for determining which content people find more valuable.

Negative: While playing with OneRiot, I noticed next to the pulse indicators another indicator called the “Average Visit Duration.” That indicator was represented by a mini pie, which was colored in depending the average time someone spent on the site – at least that’s my interpretation. I couldn’t find an answer to how they measured or determined the Average Visit Duration.

Conclusion: ReadWriteWeb said OneRiot has the possibility to “corner niche categories with specific markets;” and I agree with them. OneRiot has the potential to drive social content if they can find more users with similar interests to further drive the popularity of their search results.

Bookmark and Share
 

The Now Is Gone Bookiversary

lunanow.jpg

Yesterday marked the one year anniversary of Now Is Gone’s release! So much has happened since then, it’s been amazing and humbling at the same time. Thank you to everyone who supported Now Is Gone (image by lunaweb).

I know Brian Solis also was humbled by the reception towards the book. For me, it was a life changing event (may write more about this on Off Hours), and the culmination of a 15 year dream of becoming an author.

Consider some of the milestones:

  • Thousands of people have read the book
  • We’ve received hundreds of thank yous from folks who said it changed their business life
  • Ike Pigott, Lauren Vargas and I wrote 200 accompanying blog posts on the Now Is Gone blog
  • Now Is Gone received more than 50 positive reviews
  • It was cited by the Wall Street Journal as a resource for small businesses (thank you, Scott Monty)
  • and, it won a silver Axiom Business Book Award
  • Perhaps the most exciting news is that we are approximately 2/3 of the way through the first print edition, and are starting to weigh edits/changes to the original manuscript. The second edition will provide an update, as well as the lessons learned. Some likely changes include more on influencer relations, more on social networks, less on blogs, more on the media’s use of social media, and fewer typos

    A Final Bow for First Edition Sources

    The following bloggers had either blog posts cited in and/or were interviewed for the first edition of Now Is Gone. Some of them won’t make it to the second edition as the book will change quite a bit.

    These sources will remain listed permanently on the Now Is Gone blog to honor them and provide business readers additional source material. If you have questions about marketing the book, or the use of bloggers as sources, I refer you to the previous post, “Marketing Now Is Gone.” To the bloggers, thank you for creating great content in the new media world. The book’s sources are:

    Bookmark and Share
     

    Rebutting Six Arguments for Personal Brands

    personal-brand-cover.jpg

    Since last Thursday’s post, “I Don’t Care About Your Personal Brand,” there have been many conversations about why personal brands are or are not valid marketing models (image by Nirav Mehta). There have been some threads that unite to form general arguments for the personal brand, which deserve some discussion. Why? Because they fail to serve social media communicators who work with actual companies.

    1) Self-centeredness: I’ve heard self awareness and self fulfillment as reasons to cultivate personal brands. Why don’t we just call this category self-centered since it’s the personal brand using excuses about self worth to cultivate a personal brand.

    How does ego-centric branding help a corporation? Why would deploying self-centered brands positively help them affect change, stop contrived messaging and engage in real conversations?

    Like the personal brand, companies have been too self-centered, and not market centric. This is the heart of the Cluetrain Manifesto. Any social media consultant needs to read this book, otherwise they will not understand the underpinnings of the social web.

    Companies need to stop BS, and start conversing in real dialogue, as opposed to employing rock stars who may or may not offer value in conversations about larger products/solutions and market needs. Social media requires a human voice, not a rock star personal brand. Just a real person with a real voice reaching out in a genuine conversation.

    I will say the two can coincide if the personality adheres to the company role. Consider Scott Monty and Shashi Bellamkonda.

    2) Personal brands work for consultants: True. It works for the person. That’s great if you are an author or an independent “Army of One.”

    See, the problem is an individual consultant’s model – personal branding – is being sold to companies, and it doesn’t work on a large scale. It does not work for corporate communications – my primary focus. Companies by their very definition are more than one person.

    If you are Microsoft do you really want another Robert Scoble to come and go? Further, personal brands and rock stars undermine teams and the kind of collaborative cultures necessary for corporate success.

    It’s about we, not me. This is a universal facet of all successful life relationships — personal or business. Look how $200 million worth of all-stars have benefited the New York Yankees. Zero rings since 2000.

    11804430.jpg

    3) Social Media: But it’s social media! Really? I don’t think there’s anything social about a contrived personal brand. I think being genuine and allowing your personality to come through in a conversation is social. Social media implies more than one (as does communications) in a conversation, and conversations offer genuine dialogue between people, not personal brands.

    Personal branding is all about the individual. So when we communicate personal brands in social media spaces we’re messaging at people, rather than engaging with them. That makes for a pretty bad conversation, IMO. See Cluetrain again, and spare me the personal brand BS.

    If you are over-cultivating an intentional personal brand, it’s contrived for business (or vanity) and does not equate to a real conversation. Conversations become a notch in your belt towards achieving your self-image rather than a meaningful, sincere two way conversation.

    4) Personal branding is about building value: Really? Maybe. The way I was taught branding is that a brand is a promise about a service to the marketplace that’s communicated through visual and verbal communications, as well as the actual product/service experiences.

    Building value is about selling stuff to people. Trust me, I do it everyday when I send emails to prospects that contain links to valuable articles related to their business.

    So is personal branding promising to deliver something to the market, or is it salesmanship? If that persona is a consultant or an author then I would say a personal brand. But if not, I might argue the latter — it’s selling in the classic Jeffrey Gitomer sense.

    And if building value is really branding an individual vis a vis thought leadership, how does that personal brand translate to a company’s brand and value proposition? It doesn’t do so very naturally, and I don’t see it as a smart social communications strategy for a company.

    5) You need personality online: Yes! This is true. That’s why we recommend Rohit Bharagava‘s book to clients who struggle with this. But there’s a difference between being yourself, and manifesting contrived “Flair” online. Sooner or later BS like this gets called out, or loses attention from the community.

    The most successful individuals with thousands of followers on Twitter (the home of the personal brand) are those that just let it hang out in a natural way. They don’t monitor Qwitter for optimal following, etc. Instead, they do what they do, and share what they want. There’s no real formal strategy.

    6) But you yourself are a personal brand: Am I? Umm, until someone else besides me gets Now Is Gone tattooed on their body, I’m not buying it. It’s gotta take more than a couple thousand friends and followers to become a brand. That bar is way too low. No, I’m just another mouthy blogger. Search Technorati, you’ll find we’re a dime a dozen (image by Shashi Bellamkonda).

    nowtat.jpg

    No one comes to this company because I ride a Ducati. Or because I am particularly vocal on Twitter and on marketing issues like this one. In fact, one could argue that while my personality online rings through and I am genuine, that these aspects of my personality turn away some business opportunities. Clients come to us because of a proven, award-winning track record of social media successes.

    Further, Geoff Livingston, the individual, is not Livingston Communications. There is more than a handful of people operating under this masthead, all with their own personal brand identities. In reality, promising me as Livingston Communications would be bad branding because it would be a lie. I can’t do all or even most of the work. That’s why we are a company, and one that hopes to add ownership partners in 2009.

    I made this same point to personal brander Dan Schawbel. For the record, if you are an individual seeking to build a good consulting brand, I do think Dan’s blog offers great value..

    Bookmark and Share
     

    Goodness Gracious, Great Blogs of Fire!

    2008blogsoffire3Inspired by Al Gore’s keynote at Web 2.0 Summit, the quality of Brian Solis’ thoughts on the social revolution for change deserve special recognition. The following is an excerpt from Brian’s post, but I encourage all to read his words in full on PR 2.0.

    This election, as well as Gore’s passion for change, is the manifestation of decades of technological evolution. After all, this is about people. We witnessed the amalgamation of people, ideas, and the social technology that connected them and amplified their cause. This is an evolution, Gore believes, as do many of us, which was christened with the introduction of Gutenberg’s printing press.

    It is arguably, the onset of the true democratization of information. The Social Web is simply the advancement of a paramount foundation that synthesizes an individual voice with an interconnected distribution platform where it’s heard, shared and fused with like-minded people and the idea-driven and passion-fueled collectives they represent.

    His vision for the Web is its sense of “purpose,” which is how we can take the evolution of not only the technology that defines it, but also the people who use it to communicate with one another.

    “I believe Web 2.0 has to have a purpose,” Gore observed.

    I agree, but would simply say that “The Web,” socially rooted, must have a purpose. It’s not just about promoting brands, marketing at people, raising money, or electing politicians using new mediums and shiny new objects.

    The Social Revolution is Our Industrial Revolution.

    It is our chance to contribute to our history and our future by investing a piece of ourselves into what we create, embrace, and release to the world.

    Our work and purpose is far from realized however.

    The fact that the “Web’s candidate of choice won this time is no reason to rest easy,” Gore reminded us.

    The democratization of media requires constant innovation and cultivation. Only through education and experience can we create a more literate society that bonds through knowledge.

    “Just as Barack Obama’s election would’ve been impossible without the new dialogue and new ways of interacting–the Web–the only way (climate change) is going to be solved is by addressing the democracy crisis, and the country hit a great blow for victory this week, but we have to take this issue and raise it in the awareness of everyone,” Gore emphatically stated.

    The online community is continuously developing its social norms. The controversial issue of advertising on Twitter is discussed on Old Media New Tricks. Robert Quigley says, “If you or your organization doesn’t understand Twitter and what makes it great, stay away from advertising until you do.” Check out the post to see five additional rules of thumb to follow when considering advertising on Twitter. And remember, “Give up the money before you give up your community.”

    “This week socialmedian is proud to bring you special online access to the Monaco Media Forum,” says Jason Goldberg. The media forum is November 12 – 14 and topics to be covered include “emerging opportunities in technology, distribution and content, as well as the implications for marketing and finance.” For a full range of multimedia covering the event, check out the socialmedian blog.

    How do you differentiate the friends that you know in person from friends you know online? Would you consider having an online friend that you’ve never met in person babysit your children? On his blog LouisGray.com, Louis says, “I believe people are inherently good, and I’ve chosen to interact with good people online, who share ideas, are trustworthy and positive to be around.” So go ahead, split a room with a friend you know only online at your next social media convention – if they wrong you, you’ll have the option of embarrassing them online.

    Bookmark and Share
     

    Top Six Social Media Markets in 2009

    growth.jpg

    It’s apparent that we’re in for a deep, long recession. As our leadership rallies to fight the economic tide, those of us with businesses (or individual careers) need to continue moving forward. With an eye towards the near future market of 2009, here’s my projections for the top six opportunities in social media next year (image by Adelswood).

    1) Government: Obama is in and that means government 2.0 will start becoming a rapid adoption communications vehicle for federal, and then state and local will follow. It’s inevitable that Obama will want government to adopt the incredible grassroots tools that swept him into office. The key here isn’t building grassroots networks to get the word out; it’s to help communities and the government connect to facilitate faster more intelligent governance.

    Tip for non DC types: Because of the political appointee and government contracting cycle, don’t expect to see any real dollars flow until bare minimum 3Q next year, more likely 4Q. October marks the beginning of the federal fiscal year and the first full year of spending under the big O. For those of you who need a fast brush up on federal procurement, check out my friend Jimmy Baker’s upcoming book on the topic.

    2) Maintenance: Whether it’s auto or house repair, people will want to fix ‘er up rather than throw it out and buy a new one. Cost becomes a big issue, which can become a boon for the right companies that can market themselves intelligently. Social media tools can be used to provide value added conversations on how to maintain and repair.

    Think Midas, Home Depot, Duron paints, etc. The business case is obvious, now it becomes a question of whether their executives have the vision and foresight to invest in marketing to maximize their opportunity.

    3) Booze: Yup, one thing that’s historically true about troubled times is a boom market for producers of hard liquor, beer and wine. Get to know your local maker of spirits and engage with the community on stories about good times! Or how to brew your own. Or whatever. This one’s a no-brainer for anyone with the slightest bit of creativity.

    4) Security: Bad times bring another traditional increase: Crime. That means security products — both commercial and personal — will be in higher demand. Related corporate social media can help people through these times by facilitating conversation on the topic… thus providing value add to the community.

    5) Causes: With bad times come great causes. No communication tool set is better positioned to activate the public and engaged in grassroots education than social media. I expect to see (as well as participate in) some fantastic campaigns as cause communicators rely on these tools more and more frequently.

    6) Technology companies: According to the Washington Post, six of the ten most capitalized companies still standing are tech companies. We’ve experienced some volatility with smaller tech cos this year, but some of our most stable accounts are also tech cos. There’s no question the tech sector will experience more volatility as the long awaited culling of un-needed or broken social technology cos happens, but good companies with strong solutions will continue thriving. Tech will do better than most sectors.

    Would you add any other verticals to the 2009 “hot list?”

    Bookmark and Share
     

    Social Media for Social Good

    I have the great privilege of teaching a post graduate class next semester at Georgetown University, called “Social Media for Social Good.” Qui Diaz has agreed to teach with me, promising a high powered experience for social cause communicators seeking to engage their communities online.

    quisdaboss.jpg

    Here’s a sneak preview of the syllabus for MPPR-785-01, “Social Media for Social Good,” including the text books…

    Social media offers organizations an indispensable tool set for a wide variety of philanthropic activities including activism, education, donor and volunteer development, and direct fundraising. Because of its inherently personal and community-based nature, social media provides an ideal canvas to work within, allowing causes to not just communicate, but also to activate and invigorate significant grassroots activity.

    To effectively use social media for social good, nonprofit communicators need to cross the great divide from one-way to two-way communications. This challenge should be easier for communicators to embrace since creating active publics is at the heart of good cause marketing, but it’s still a major challenge.

    Communities and individuals associate their online activities with interests, character and personality. They inherently reject organizational insertion into their conversations. When it comes to social causes, the cause must inspire the individual on personal level, and then activate that person to engage in the larger community and corresponding conversations.

    Conversational engagement and dissemination of cause-based ideas by the community, whether the organization participates or not, represents the heart of civic-minded social media. True “social” media – built with the right calls to action – can yield measurable results for impact: from cultivated relationships to widespread education, advocacy, volunteerism and donor giving.

    Organizations need to transition from messaged communications at their audiences to understanding the community (and the people within it) in order to inspire and engage in larger conversations. This requires a significant shift in communications ethos, a return to the basis of solid, strategic marketing principles, and also a core understanding the media form.

    In our class, we will examine social media in a general sense to understand the fundamental underpinnings of online communications. We will then examine social media and traditional marketing strategy, particularly as it applies to social causes. Here we will learn about communicating a value proposition for our communities. We will then survey the current social media tool set to see how various tactics work.

    The reading list for the class includes the following books:

    Christopher Locke, Rick Levine, Doc Searls, and David Weinberger, The Cluetrain Manifesto
    Seth Godin, Flipping the Funnel, nonprofit edition (eBook)
    Charlene Li and Josh Bernoff, Groundswell
    Geoff Livingston with Brian Solis, Now Is Gone
    Jack Trout and Al Ries, Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind
    Ben Rigby, Mobilizing Generation 2.0
    Malcolm Gladwell, The Tipping Point
    Allison Fine, Momentum

    Plus web-based case studies! It should be a great class, and if you are local and can participate, please join us. We look forward to working with the next generation of social cause communicators!

    Bookmark and Share
     

    Buzz Meter: UserNameCheck

    UserNameCheck is an online tool that checks the availability of usernames for various social networking sites. Think WHOIS, but for usernames.

    An AJAX powered service, UserNameCheck lists over 60 social networking platforms all in one dashboard. To check where your username is registered, simply type in your username in the provided field and click on “check.” UserNameCheck then lists which sites are available. Each social networking site is also linked to their homepage, in case you want to claim your username for that particular site.

    As for privacy, the UserNameCheck team only stores and asks for the username you want tested. Anyone can check any username for the sites provided. The storing of usernames is only to track the unique tests performed.

    clip_image002

    Buzz Meter Ranking: 4 out of 4 Buzz Bees

    buzzbeesmallicon84 buzzbeesmallicon84buzzbeesmallicon84buzzbeesmallicon84

    Positive: UserNameCheck is an excellent service for companies trying to create a social online presence. Organizations will want the same username for branding purposes and consistency. One username is also easier to maintain than 20 different names! The service also enables people to check where they’ve registered specific usernames (incase they forgot) or to see how many social networks they’ve joined.

    Negative: UserNameCheck takes a while to verify availability; sometimes 30 seconds to 3 minutes. Currently, the service has over 60 sites listed and is in the process of adding more. With the addition of more sites, the time it takes to check for availability of a username may also increase.

    Conclusion: Almost all online social networks you join require a username. The creators of UserNameCheck are ahead of the game acknowledging the growth of online social networks and the possibility of people wanting the same usernames. What would we do without WHOIS to check for domain name availability? Now, with UserNameCheck, we have a similar tool for usernames. The idea and the tool is brilliant!

    Bookmark and Share
     

    I Don’t Care About Your Personal Brand

    All of the personal brand noise in the echo chamber amazes me. Why? Because it’s not good marketing.

    We are in a recession, and telling people they need personal brands infused in their marketing – while important – will not help companies close transactions. Yes people do business with folks they like, but that’s only a pre-cursor for success. There are lots of people that folks like who are losing jobs and contracts right now.

    Thus personal brand propagators seek to bulwark a business model destined to fail. What people need to do is build substantive value for stakeholders that will deliver return on investment for time or money. If personal brands are infused in this value, all the better, but please don’t tell me its the quintessential focus of social media marketing.

    DucofGeoff.jpg

    Quite frankly online marketing is not about silly personalities with motorcycles (me) or rubber ducks or even pole dancing. If you want to defend your right to be stupid — all in the name of a personal brand — go for it. But while momentarily interesting, your personal brand won’t build real value for the market – unless your personal reputation revolves around delivering consistent regular value to your community.

    There is a big difference between reputation and personal brands. Reputation is built upon past experiences — good or bad, a real track record. Personal branding is often an ego-based image based on communications. A personal brand can demonstrate a person is there, but it’s often shallow and can be contrived. It’s just like a sport stripe on a car, nice but no engine, no guts, no substance.

    Chris Brogan is always cited as the penultimate in personal brands. I disagree, Chris Brogan has a personal brand, but more importantly he has a fantastic reputation for delivering great, helpful content every day. The combo of incredible value AND the personal brand is lethal. But one would succeed without the other, and its not the personal brand.

    25 Personal Brand Manifestos

    Here’s some brutal truths delivered Cluetrain Style for those propagating personal brands as the keystones to social media.

    1) The online community — a.k.a. the market — doesn’t give a damn about your personal brand.

    2) The only people who give a crap about personal brands are the personas trying to prop them up as a business model.

    3) While personal brands are concerned with themselves, the market is also concerned about itself.

    4) The market doesn’t care about the persona, only what value the persona contributes to the larger community.

    5) Ultimately, if the market does not perceive value, the personal brand — while famous — will not successfully monetize him/herself.

    6) Businesses do not need personal brands to succeed online. They need to come off their ivory towers and communicate with the market in real conversations.

    7) Then companies need to listen so they can give back to their online communities and markets vis a vis real valuable information or products.

    8) Messaging — whether delivered through a personal brand or from the corporate ivory tower — doesn’t work online!

    9) Personal brands can be contrived and faked.

    10) If a personal brand promises one thing and delivers another, their personal name is mud!

    11) If a company over-relies on personal brands it can be let down with no social media presence post persona (Microsoft and Scoble)

    12) Personal brands can let the market down… in some cases regularly (Calcanis).

    13) If a personal brand becomes regularly tied to a corporate brand, then it’s not personal. It’s business.

    14) Having personal interaction is a small part of the larger value proposition to the market in order for it to have a transaction with you. It is not a business model in itself.

    15) The difference between a good personal reputation and personal brands is subtle. One delivers constant substance while the other relies on BS to overcome shortcomings.

    16) The only value of a personal brand is blinding the uneducated on lack of social media expertise (from Micah).

    17) When a personal brand fails to deliver real expertise, the market turns quickly on the persona.

    18) Twenty years later national personas gone wrong get super bowl ads (MC Hammer, Vanilla Ice, or in the case of K-Fed 2 years later). Micro personal brands online are simply forgotten.

    19) When reality catches up with personal brand hype, bad endings occur.

    20) The marketplace wants solutions, not to feel better by hanging out with coolness. Even better if you can provide both, but at least provide the prior.

    21) Personal brands are like toilet paper. They are a tradable commodity on the interent. Reputation is another thing.

    22) Social media consultants rely on personal brands, communicators rely on building value between organizations and their stakeholders.

    23) Communicators can measure their social effort, personal brands talk about friends and “hubris.”

    24) A personality oriented brand does not necessarily equate to successful results. Ask John “Maverick” McCain.

    25) The marketplace doesn’t need specific personalities. There’s always another chap who can fill the role.

    Refocus on Others

    So what do you do if you are over-relying on personal brands? As part of the Solutions Stars Video Conference, I wrote a post about rising above the noise that offered five tips. Here’s a short summary:

  • Build value for the community with meaningful conversations.
  • Have an opinion. Great voices on the Internet have an opinion and stand by it, even if some folks don’t like it.
  • Be generous and give your spotlight to others.
  • In addition to building value and shining a light on others, write/create great content.
  • Be you. Personality, genuine, transparent, authentic… Whatever, choose your word of choice.
  • There’s a reason personality was fifth in that post. Communicators put their stakeholders before their egos.

    Thanks to Amber Naslund who brainstormed with me and inspired some of the 25 manifestos.

    Bookmark and Share
     

    The Communicators’ Election Breakdown

    obama-rally.jpg

    Now that Obama has officially won, post mortems can begin. Ragan Communications ran a great story about what the election taught communicators. All in all the article had 15 tips for communicators.

    I was interviewed and offered a couple of tips for Michael Sebastian’s piece:

    1) Social media is here to stay.

    You know the executives that balk at implementing social media campaigns, well Barack Obama and John McCain showed that social media is no passing fad. Both candidates embraced blogs, social networks and Web video.

    “These presidential campaigns are always trying to innovate and try the latest, greatest and best ways to activate their grassroots constituencies,” explained Washington D.C.-based PR pro Geoff Livingston. “And so for them to use social media tools as heavily as they have is to legitimize it.”

    2) Tap into social networks.

    The Obama campaign created a social network, MyBarackObama, on its official Web site. Members of that network at times criticized the candidate over his various positions. Livingston called this an ideal model for large corporate organizations.

    “If you can’t control your local people or your retail chain (for instance, a large charity or an automobile manufacturer with dealerships all over the place) who might be communicating or blogging on social networks then give them the tools to communicate. Enable them with the brand; don’t control them,” he explained.

    The article offers some substantive points. I hope you’ll check it out. I’d also like to add a couple more reflection points.

    McCain’s attempts to play into his personal brand — “maverick” — backfired on him. At first Palin bulwarked the claims and the race was neck and neck. But then the economy tanked, and McCain pulled out of the first debate to save the country vis a vis our 700 billion dollar bail-out. Whoops. All of the sudden the Palin choice came underfire. Note for communicators: A personality oriented brand does not necessarily equate to successful results.

    Here’s what some Twitterers thought of the maverick personal branding:

    TwitsonMcCain.jpg

    And secondly, TV still matters. I think Obama handed McCain his hat in the debates, not by being wittier, but simply coming across as younger and more vibrant. It was a rerun of Kennedy versus Nixon in that sense.

    What do you think were the key communications lessons from the 2008 election?

    Bookmark and Share