The Illusion Known as Control

Control as defined by Dictionary.com –verb (used with object)

1. to exercise restraint or direction over; dominate; command.

2. to hold in check; curb: to control a horse; to control one’s emotions.

3. to test or verify (a scientific experiment) by a parallel experiment or other standard of comparison.

4. to eliminate or prevent the flourishing or spread of: to control a forest fire.

I saw a tweet earlier this week from Todd Defren that control was only an illusion. Then I saw this crazy response from The Speakers Bureau justifying moderating comments on the Top Ten Speakers Bureau post to serve their marketing message. And of course, there’s my daily grind, the trudge to get organizations to relinquish control of the message.

control4

It’s amazing to me that years into the social web, this is still a point of contention. Yet, control issues remain the inescapable downfall of many organizations in their social media efforts. Instead of avoiding blogging about it — as I have for many, many months (why sing the same song over and over again) –  it’s time to reopen the discussion.  Why are organizations struggling so much with control?

control2

In my mind, it transcends social media or communications. Yes, there’s the whole history of command and control PR that’s a by-product of mass communications.

But in reality, it’s about power.  People want to try and control people all the time. They want to exert power of one another, whether that’s through the promise of love, through threat of force (hello, Iran!), through economic means, etc., etc.  Control and power have gone together hand in hand since Adam and Eve.

control3

Ironically, it’s by surrendering the illusion of control over others that one really gains power in life.  When we realize that it’s only our own reactions that we have any kind of control over, we gain great insight into life.  I cannot stop other people from doing what they want to do. There is no control of others. I wonder how many people realize that.

In the case of companies, as Todd said, they never really had control.  It’s just with the social web the myth of message control has been smashed to smithereens. The emperor has no clothes. And corporate America is horrified and reeling.

The Speakers Bureau Example

It was funny reading The Speakers Bureau Founder Shawn Ellis’s lament about how I should have called them before writing last week’s post on the women’s speaking issue. He dubbed it an attack:

As easy as it would have been to call us or send an email, the leaders of this attack instead chose to mobilize a mass of people against us without fully knowing who we are or exactly what we do.

If I was a journalist that may have been the protocol, but I’m not. I’m a blogger and I have no need to call Shawn. Besides in hindsight, I’m sure my email or call would have been ignored, just like many of the deleted comments on his top ten post. Ironically, if he had  left a comment, it would have been welcome here.

control1

The thing that the Shawn Ellises of the world fail to understand is that their customers and other stakeholders are not obliged to believe their messages or spin.  We – the customer, the consumer, the partner, the potential speaker, the blogger, the conference goer – are not beholden to them. In fact, when we see such obvious efforts at control, we are repelled by them.

It’s only in surrendering “control” that organizations can win this game. But the battle over this issue will be a long one. Real or perceived power tends to be something people have a hard time relinquishing.

 

FORSCOM Speech in Tweets

DSC_0329

On Monday, CRT/tanaka President Mike Mulvihill and I had the great honor of discussing social media with the senior leadership of U.S. Army Forces Command (FORSCOM), including Four Star General Campbell (pictured at the left) and Three Star Lt. General Pederson. FORSCOM is actively exploring how to best use social media for the benefit of 80% of U.S. Army forces, including some exciting ideas for keeping families engaged with deployed soldiers. You can see an early precursor of FORSCOM’s work on their Facebook page, which engages families with questions.

DSC_0323

It was an honor to serve our country for a day with this discussion. Thank you to Colonel Collins and his excellent public affairs staff for the opportunity.  The U.S. Army is blessed to have such talented, kind people working for it.

While I did not write the speech out, FORSCOM did tweet the session.  Below find the tweets for an abstract view of our conversation…

FORSCOM4

FORSCOM3 

FORSCOM2

FORSCOM

 

Why Deploy an iPhone App?

5930_109428531684_728506684_2707497_8248650_n.jpg

This weekend, Washington, DC area internet developer Viget Labs hosted iPhoneDevCampDC, an unconference about all things iPhone Apps (full photo set here). I went expressly to understand the latest hot, shiny object from a communicator’s perspective. How does this tactic fit into the mix?

One thing that’s important to note off the bat: It’s not a cheap thing to become universally available with your application. An iPhone app is operating system specific. It will not work well on Symbian, or Blackberry, or Windows Mobile, or any other operating system.

From a budgetary standpoint this is crucial: An Iphone App may cost $30,000 to develop, and the accompanying Blackberry App — even though it’s the exact same app with the same function and similar art — must be completely reprogrammed. That means it, too, will cost additional tens of thousands of dollars.

In turn, those who don’t have a wide ranging mobile interactive budget will need to select the platform that best serves its customer base. Enterprise users will slant towards Blackberry, consumer iPhone, international companies will want to consider Symbian, and who knows how Android will impact the market.

Generally speaking there are many reasons to deploy an application, iPhone or not:

  • To make money (warning, a highly competitive marketplace with low $ sales).
  • Ensuring your content, social network or services is easily accessible on a mobile platform.
  • To effectively market your product using a popular application.
  • Because the executive is demanding it. Unfortunately, shiny object syndrome seems to be an increasingly common reason, said several of the developers.

The iPhone app store itself is a highly competitive marketplace with tens of thousands of apps. You can no longer simply launch an application and expect it garner attention. Instead, you should be prepared to market it. To help, MobileCrunch’s Gagan Biyani gave a primer on pitching the press. In addition, pricing strategies are critical, with many developers relying a strong free app to attract paid purchases of higher dollar ($1.99 or more), feature-rich versions.

Some interesting statistics where given by TapMetrics’s Chris Brown:

  • English (94%) is used for the majority of iphone apps, followed by German, French, and Japanese.
  • 26% of apps are free, 41% of apps are $.99, 33% of apps are $1.99.
  • One person has 2024 apps in the store, or 3.15% of the iPhone app store.

Lastly, don’t be cheap on development. A flurry of negative user ratings can sink your application right out the door. In a competitive marketplace, you don’t have a lot of time to iron out bugs.

 

Final BlogPotomac Speaker, Schedule Revealed

n11535_33174695_4329.jpgNatalia Luckyanova, iPhone application developer and cofounder of Imangi Studios, has agreed to be our final speaker for the last BlogPotomac. Natalia will speak on how and when a mobile application makes sense for a company. The event will be held this October 23rd at the State Theatre in Falls Church, VA (register today!).

Natalia is a Harvard University graduate (2003) and has a masters in Computer Science (Boston University, 2006). Her company, Imangi Studios, LLC is an independent game development studio based in Washington, DC. The iPhone is the company’s current mobile platform of choice, and we plan to branch out to other platforms in the future as well.

In addition, our schedule for the event is now locked. Special thanks to Shel Israel who graciously is sharing the keynote spot with Beth Kanter, and will go second. We decided this was the right thing to do after reviewing BlogPotomac’s line-up in the wake of Wednesday’s Women Speaking post.

Line-up for the Final BlogPotomac

8:00 Doors open

Traditional Social Media Keynotes

8:45 Opening remarks by Emcees and Communications Bloggers Amber Naslund and Geoff Livingston

8:55 Top-ranked Changeblogger Beth Kanter discusses social causes and their use of new media

9:40 Twitterville Author Shel Israel discusses the new book, and also gives some glimpses in the future

10:25 Break

Mobile Phone Sessions

10:40 iMangi Studios Natalia Luckyanova discusses mobile phone applications.

11:25 Shane Lennon, Senior Vice President, Marketing & Product Management at GyPSii®, will discuss location-based mobile social networking.

12:10 Lunch

The Future of Online Media Sessions

1:40 crayonista and ace strategist Jane Quigley will discuss future Internet media forms, such as the semantic web and other new forms she’s watching.

2:25 Bar Opens, Special Announcement from Geoff Livingston

2:45 FortiusOne CEO Sean Gorman will talk about the impact location based technologies and mapping are making on the web.

3:30 Ning’s Peter Slutsky will discuss the evolution and future of niche social networks and communities.

4:15 End of Conference