Pepsi’s Super Refreshing Social Play

pepsi-new-logo.jpgWhen Pepsi declined to advertise in this year’s Super Bowl, it was big news. The best sure-fire mass media event in the nation lost one of its mainstays, who opted for a significant $20 million corporate responsibility-based social media program instead.

The Pepsi Refresh online program — set to launch this Wednesday — combines a few online trends. Pepsi Refresh focuses on civic engagement with a particular bend towards hyperlocal activity. While social, it is expected to go well beyond Facebook and Twitter and involves significant crowdsourcing initiatives for participants who want to win funding for local causes.

This program represents a significant gamble for Pepsi, but one that has been coming for a while. It makes sense that a brand that has been losing market share is willing to take this risk, and really try to invest a new form of marketing that will dramatically increase loyalty and Word of Mouth.

In theory, this is great news, but there are pitfalls to consider. Chase Bank ran a similar campaign two months ago awarding $5 million, but inspired as much angst in its effort (hat tip: Beth Kanter) as it did good. Chase’s issue was a failure to react swiftly to a groundswell demanding more transparency into the process.

It’s a bold move with great potential. $20 million can do a lot of good, more than the 3 or 4 minutes of airtime it would have bought. If invested well, the dollars can also inspire great loyalty. There are many hurdles in architecting such a campaign that need to be considered, too.

Let’s hope Pepsi can execute on the dream, and provide one of the biggest corporate social media successes this side of Dell. I’m rooting for them!

General Media Trend Implications

Forrester had an interesting analysis on their interactive marketing blog about how even the most venerable TV programs need to be concerned about online competition. With fragmented media continuing to fracture and TV audiences dwindling, this trend — signified by Pepsi moving away from mass programming — will only hasten. At the same time, video and TV — particularly mobile TV is getting hotter. It will be fascinating to watch the evolving video marketplace.

 

A Tale of Two HIPAA Violations

By Jenn Riggle 

Photo courtesy of Hoggheff aka Hank Ashby aka Mr. Freshtags

Photo courtesy of Hoggheff aka Hank Ashby aka Mr. Freshtags

It sounds like something out of a Charles Dickens’ novel. While most of us were busy preparing for the holidays, two stories were unfolding in different parts of the country where hospital employees lost their jobs because they of HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) violations.

The first story takes place in Houston, where 16 hospital employees were fired for accessing the medical record of a medical resident who was hospitalized after being shot during an attempted robbery.

According to George Hulme’s blog for Health Information Trust Alliance, this looks like a simple case of hospital employees “snooping” to find out confidential patient information. The sad thing is that even though the employees may have accessed the medical record out of concern, they didn’t have the right to do this simply because they worked there.

The National Association Medical Staff Services (NAMSS) reminds us that HIPAA requires hospitals to deliver “appropriate sanctions” when employees violate the law. But rather than using this incident as a teaching opportunity and suspending them and offering more HIPAA training, the hospital quickly terminated the 16 employees.

Another thing to think about: How was the hospital able to identify the people who viewed her record? Hulme hypothesizes that the hospital was monitoring and logging patient record access and was alerted to the increased interest in this patient’s medical record. Truly, Big Brother is watching you.

The second story takes place in Mississippi where a hospital administrative assistant was forced to resign because hospital officials believed that a tweet she sent to the Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour violated HIPAA regulations.

According to news reports, the governor wrote on his Twitter page that he was, “Glad the Legislature recognizes our dire fiscal situation. Look forward to hearing their ideas on how to trim expenses.”

The employee sent a tweet to the governor saying, “Schedule regular medical exams like everyone else instead of paying UMC employees over time to do it when clinics are usually closed.”

While the employee clearly references a check-up the governor had at the hospital, no real patient information was shared. In fact, according to reports, the employee didn’t believe she violated privacy laws. She’s quoted as saying, “I wasn’t really jabbing at him…That’s just what people do on Twitter.”

Maybe the biggest mistake this employee made was making a snarky comment to someone in a position of power. This comment wouldn’t have been appropriate if she sent it to the governor via e-mail or said it to him in person – let alone made it in a public forum like Twitter. Her tweet referenced a past hospital visit and implies that the hospital gave preferential treatment to a patient – which made both the hospital and the governor uncomfortable.

While these are completely different stories, they both show that hospital employees are unsure about HIPAA regulations and how they apply to them.

The Takeaway: Hospitals need to share stories like these with their employees to help bring clarity to regulations that often seem murky and confusing.

 

Holiday Resolutions For Social Media

As I gathered with family and friends over the holidays this year I did something amazing: I didn’t check Facebook or Twitter!

Rate your social media participation over the 2009 holidays (12/23/2009 – 01/04/2010)?

1 – Declined a lot
[ 45% (14 votes) ]
2
[ 13% (4 votes) ]
3 – Stayed about the same
[ 32% (10 votes) ]
4
[ 3% (1 votes) ]
5 – Increased substantially
[ 6% (2 votes) ]
Other





We all heard about how social media was influential for increasing e-sales by “efficient, low-cost way for retailers to communicate directly”. So we know retail is listening to the power of social media.

How well did it personally connect people with people during the holidays? Personally I found it hard to engage users online when I had so much going on IRL (in real life). To communicate I reverted back to the old way of communication – email and phone. So much for new technology/networks when parts of the family are still figuring out dial-up.

So what does this activity mean for engaging this year on a personal or brand level? Taking a thought from Dan Zarrella’ post about predictions social media marketing evolution. The user base of most online networks are demanding a more targeted and personalized experience. This stems from the fact that ultimately the user wants more than a face to a profile – there needs to be in real life connection. It’s been proven model for business – so there should be no difference for personal connections. TrendsSpotting’s 2010 trend pre­dic­tions in 140 characters – emphasizes the fact that personal connection will take social media to the next level this year.

In conclusion this year I hope to find the right balance between real life and social media relationship. What is your resolution or personal goal for social media engagement?

 

New Year – Same Old Aught Decade Hang Ups

 

By Mike Mulvihill

4219923214_11671894e2

Photo: Courtesy Optical Illusion 

First the good news – business loves social media.  A January 3 update to the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth Center for Marketing Research annual survey on the adoption and practice of social media by the Inc. 500, a list of the fastest-growing private companies in the U.S., found that more businesses are experimenting and engaging with social media.  Among the survey respondents, 91 percent of companies report they incorporated at least one social media service or tool in 2009. Literacy and awareness was also on the rise with roughly 75 percent stating that they were now “very familiar” with social networking. Conversely, there was an impressive drop in Inc 500 companies that did not use social media at all, which plunged from 43 percent in 2007 to 9 percent in 2009.

Among smaller business, the trend lags. A November 2009 survey  produced for area Chambers of Commerce in North Dakota and Minnesota asked about their use of popular social media platforms for maintaining either Personal and Business connections.  For business leaders in four Midwestern markets, Facebook is the social media platform of choice. Facebook is the platform most frequently mentioned as the site used by respondents (70 percent personal use; 43 percent business use). LinkedIn was the platform next most frequently mentioned as the site used by respondents (23 percent personal use; 41 percent business use). Twitter (17 percent personal use; 19 percent business use) was about even with Blogs (15 percent personal use; 20% business use) as the third most frequently mentioned platform used by respondents  Three others in the survey lagged significantly in use by respondents – My Space, MSN Live Space and Wikis.

As Larry Weintraub covers in his Smart Marketing blog, these businesses have likely zeroed in on the four reasons to use Social Media for your business – Marketing, PR, Market Research and Customer Service.

Now, here’s the bad news.  Control is still a major issue, especially at larger companies. According to a nationwide survey conducted by Robert Half Technology, 54 percent of 1,400 companies surveyed completely restrict employees from visiting social networking sites. Another 19 percent restrict use for business purposes only.

Businesses are increasingly using social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter for marketing purposes, but those same companies don’t want employees logging on during work hours.

The Robert Half spokesperson said employers find social networking a waste of time. “It takes away from primary responsibility. When socializing on sites such as Facebook, we lose track of time.”

A secondary concern companies mentioned is the potential for employees leaking confidential information or sharing thoughts that may reflect badly on the company.  The spokesperson said that many of these companies are still trying to set boundaries.

 So while business increasing embraces the desire to “push out” info using social media, they still have not gotten over the fact that they have engage communities by trusting people to have conversations with customers, suppliers and their many other stakeholders.

 I’d love to see a survey of how many of the 91 percent of companies using social media are failing miserably because they still just don’t get the fact that every employee is an ambassador, whether at the supermarket, a cocktail party, the kids soccer match or when active on a social media site. They trust their salesmen to represent the company unsupervised, but can’t trust their employees to use social media responsibly. Seems like there’s still a lot of growing up to be done in 2010.

 

AppMakr Makes iPhone Apps Acce$$ible

by Geoff Livingston

Every smart internet marketer and company wants to deploy mobile apps, starting with that hot and shiny iPhone app. Yet the cost of developing iPhone applications (as well as applications for the Blackberry and Android platforms) can be cost prohibitive. AppMakr changed the iPhone application paradigm today with the launch of its $200 development service.

green_landing_page.png

Along with prominent bloggers Seth Godin, Guy Kawasaki, Robert Scoble and Jeff Jarvis, I was given a free whirl on the AppMakr service. The resulting application is the Greenversation app, which gathers the latest posts from my favorite environmental information resources. I originally compiled the list for a Live Earth/Blog Action day post last fall. You can download the Greenversation app from the iTunes store now.

A few thoughts on this groundbreaking service. It definitely democratizes iPhone apps, and makes them accessible to every person. Of course to do it cheap — like a free blog on the Blogger or WordPress service — you have to publish under the AppMakr name. Owning your application costs a little more ($499), similar to developing a blog on your own hosting service.

Like other social media content platforms, development is pretty easy for the none iPhone savvy. Users enter a website URL or keywords and AppMakr will create a sample iPhone app built from that content. Users can then customize the iPhone application by:

  • Adding content feeds, including Twitter, RSS, iTunes podcast, Flickr, YouTube, Blogger, mp4, and others
  • Changing the app’s branding, including the icon, splash screen, tab icons, header image, and text colors
  • Monetizing the app by charging for it on iTunes, or by adding ads from AdMob, Medialets, DoubleClick and Google AdSense

By no means does this replace a full-on application developed with a specific organizational purpose. But it is an extremely cost effective way to make sure your brand’s content is easily accessible to iPhone users without redeveloping everything for the platform. In that sense, I think the AppMakr service is a no brainer for most small companies and nonprofits.

If you are interested in trying out AppMakr and want to do it for just $50, here’s your chance. The service has a special launch offer for Buzz Bin readers. Here are the details:

  • Coupon name – LIVINGSTON
  • Coupon amount – $150 off the $199 price of making an app
  • Coupon valid through – 1/18/10