OUR EXPERTISE:

The Science of Getting Healthy – What Marketers Can Learn from Research

by Darby Brignac

From corporations to insurers to health care providers, there is a rush to reward those who take proactive steps in living a healthier lifestyle. But those aren’t the only places wellness is trending.  It’s also a thriving area of research.

The Science of Getting Healthy

Last weekend, I had the opportunity to attend the Fitness and Health Bloggers Conference in Denver, Colo. We had a first-hand look at the newly established Anschutz Health and Wellness Center at the University of Colorado, which opened on April 16. The Anschutz Health and Wellness Center is taking an innovative research and education approach to understand the effects of wellness practices on the human body. To assist researchers at the University of Colorado, programs like the human performance lab, metabolic kitchen and grocery lab were implemented.

Understanding the science of exercise

The human performance lab revolutionizes athletic training by monitoring how an individual’s body reacts to exercise at a microscopic level, moving away from the popular practice of monitoring the heart rate to analyze the muscle performance.

Dr. Iñigo San Millán, an exercise physiologist, studies the metabolic responses to exercise in order to help people find the optimum pace when the body is able to manage the levels of lactic acid produced during exercise. Lactic acid is a byproduct of physical activity that causes muscles to feel sore and can break down muscle tissue if excess acid builds over time, causing injury. By recording the amount of lactic acid at various workout paces, Dr. San Millán can recommend individualized training programs based on the athletes’ goals and body performance.

Healthy food can taste better

The University of Colorado focuses most of its research on studying bodily reactions to dietary changes. For example, one research study currently underway is evaluating how zinc is absorbed by the body. To prevent misleading results, the study volunteers must maintain a strict and unvarying diet. To ensure this, researchers are using an in-house metabolic kitchen to prepare carefully planned meals in mass amounts for diet-based studies.

The metabolic kitchen also tests recipes. During my visit, I was able to taste three samples of veggie dip and guess which dip was the healthiest with three times as much protein in it. Expecting a sample that tasted worse than the others, I chose wrong. In fact, I chose the unhealthiest dip of them all (made of whole-fat sour cream). Contrary to what many people believe, there does not have to be obvious distinctions between healthy and unhealthy recipes.

Making brand-blind decisions

The Kroger Company recently purchased a system, NuVal, that would rate all its grocery items on the same point system based on the nutritional value. Products high in sugar, fats and sodium received lower scores. For example, Kashi cereal was ranked 20 points lower than the Kroger brand wheat cereal. Ocean Breeze Cranberry Juice had a point value of 2, though it is made of 100 percent juice. This new point system helps challenge perceptions caused by branding, helping consumers make wiser and healthier decisions. The NuVal system is currently only available at the King Soopers stores, a regional store chain owned by Kroger.

To analyze the effect of the NuVal point system, Kroger sponsored the implementation of a grocery lab at the Anschutz Health and Wellness Center that would research consumer buying habits and educate people on making healthy purchases while at the grocery store. The grocery lab is designed and arranged much like the grocery store, except it does not house perishable items. The grocery lab also plans to research purchase habits for new food products before they get put on the shelves.

 

While some organizations are dealing with the currently reality of healthy behaviors, research is shaping how we achieve a healthy lifestyle in the future.

Bookmark and Share
 

Happy Hour 2.0 – Why Hotel Bars are Happening Again

THE BOOZE BIN

By Laura Petrosky (@chronic_ally)

Hotel bars used to be a sad place where lonely business travelers were wallowing in their average-at-best drinks at the end of a long workday. I just came back from a conference in Aurora, Colorado, where the hotel bar was just that – the last place you wanted to hang out at. Not even the property’s “Two for One” Happy Hour special could sweeten the deal, as the bar was uninviting, the beer selection boring and the cocktail menu non-existent.

clip_image002

Luckily, this Aurora hotel bar may soon be an exception to the rule, as hotel bars are making a steady comeback. Smart Food & Beverage directors are turning hotel-based bars from cost centers into profit centers by capitalizing on current beverage trends and using out-of-the-box Happy Hours to attract locals as well as travelers. The comeback in numbers: Beverage alcohol sales at hotels are forecasted to outpace all other segments in 2012, and overall food and beverage growth at hotels is up 4.5%, according to market research done by Technomic for VIBE.

Without further ado, here are some best practice examples of hotels making the hotel bar happening again:

 Who let the dogs out?

Ever heard of The Yappy Hour? The Rumor Resort in Las Vegas is catering to dog owners and their four legged friends with this special Happy Hour in the hotel’s courtyard. On the menu: drink specials for the humans, yappatizers for the dogs; they are even hosting a Doggie Talent Contest where the winning pooch and its owner will get a two-night stay at Rumor. Doggie Happy Hours are not new, but now they are as popular as ever. At Kimpton’s Hotel Monaco in Alexandria, Virginia, the pet-friendly event has been a staple for years. Not only does the event set Kimpton apart from local competitors, but it has generated loyal return guests among local patrons who come every week.

clip_image004

 It’s all about the micro-perspective!

You know a trend is booming if USA Today is writing about it. According to a recent article, the number of hotels serving microbrews to attract business is skyrocketing. America’s love affair with craft beers in undeniable: Craft beer sales grew by 13% from 2010 to 2011, according to the Brewers Association. Some hotels even go the extra mile and work with local breweries to have their own beers made, like the Fairmont San Francisco. In April, they launched Fairmont San Francisco Honey Saison in partnership with Almanac Beer Co, a local brewery. Four Points by Sheraton jumped on the craft beer wagon long before the topic was trending. In 2008, they appointed a Chief Beer Officer to put regional brews on Happy Hour menus. Nowadays, they have a brand-wide “Best Brews” program that features a variety of local, regional and imported craft beers.

clip_image005

 Craft cocktails are equally “hot” right now, with hotel bars competing with some of the country’s best cocktail bars. The new Conrad New York Hotel is serving up boozy popsicles in a glass of Prosecco which landed the hotel a USA Today blog post and enthusiastic Happy Hour crowds. Guests of Santa Monica’s Casa del Mar can enjoy cocktails made to order by a Cocktail Trolley from 4:30pm to 9pm daily in the hotel’s Lobby Lounge.

clip_image007

Would you like free wine with that?

I consider myself lucky when a hotel has a decent self-service coffee station. The Chambers Hotel at Belhurst Castle in the Finger Lakes wine region has a complimentary wine tap built into the wall of the lobby that allows guests to enjoy a glass of wine whenever they please. Pretty awesome, would you agree? Dating back to 1981, Kimpton hotels offer a daily complimentary “Wine Hour,” allowing guests to discover new wines hand-selected by the hotel’s master sommelier.

clip_image009

 Whether the idea of a cool Happy Hour is new to you or “vintage” in the case of Kimpton hotels, the benefits are obvious. Personally, I am a huge fan of Happy Hours that speak to both hotel guests and area residents. There is simply nothing better to wind down from a busy day while traveling for work than hanging out “where the locals go” to do the same. I have yet to find that bustling hotel bar in Aurora, Colorado. Comment on this post if you know a great hotel bar worth visiting.

 

Images courtesy of 123RF, Vegas Chatter, The Talent Jungle, Bang Style, Discover Los Angeles

Bookmark and Share
 

Why Tuition Keeps Going Up

images

By Mike Mulvihill

NPR ran a segment today (What’s Driving College Costs Higher?) featuring Kevin Carey, the director of the Education Policy Program at the New America Foundation, portraying the nation’s growing student debt crisis as the result of excessive spending by colleges and universities, which drives up tuition, and declining government support for public universities as state and local governments face budget crises.

The story’s timing is due to the impeding bewitching hour for student loan rates, which in a few days are set to double from the current 3.5 percent rate for millions of Americans if Congress can’t agree on legislation.

Carey accurately points out that that college tuition has consistently increased much faster than both inflation and incomes. And, that a major accelerant to rising college costs includes administrative and teaching costs, scholarships, sports teams and elaborate new construction projects. But other than in his opening statement, he fails to acknowledge the equally significant role of decreased state funding for public universities.

According to the Chronicle of Higher Education, public university tuition revenues today cover about 50 percent of expenditures, up from about 40 percent a decade ago. According to the State Higher Education Executive Officers association, that number was less than 25 percent in the mid-1980s.

And the problem is accelerating. An annual study of state spending on higher education found that state appropriations for colleges and students sunk by 7.6 percent in 2011-12, the largest such decline in at least a half century.

The annual Grapevine study, conducted by the Illinois State University Center for the Study of Higher Education and the State Higher Education Executive Officers, found that all but nine states experienced one-year declines from their 2010-11 totals. The 41 states that cut their spending did so by as little as 1 percent (in Indiana and North Carolina) to as much as 41 percent (New Hampshire), with a third of all states posting double-digit drops.

For decades, government has been weaning public colleges and universities from taxpayer funding. But as usual, taxpayers who actually use those services then pay more – often much more – to access these same services. As a nation, unless our states again look to fund public higher education with the aim of maintaining U.S. global leadership, Mr. Carey is exactly correct: the student debt crisis reflects a larger, (more) troubling trend in higher education.

 

Photo: supplychainalmanac.com

Bookmark and Share
 

A little bit of whatcanbe for your Friday

By Jason Poulos (@TheSaganaki)

At CRT/tanaka, we have made a promise to “whatcanbe,” a simple idea of endless creative possibilities. This mindset of looking at the world through a slightly different lens is emulated through our work, process and agency culture. Rather than sharing some digital marketing tactics today I wanted to share some videos that I felt emulated the whatcanbe mindset. Whether it’s a different way of looking at negative space, electromagnetism or a year of your life, all of these videos present a different/whatcanbe approach to a solution.

Reverse of Volume



Magnet Happy



One Second Documented Everday for a Year

Bookmark and Share
 

Beware of Oversharing in the Age of Facebook

By Debbie Myers

Beware of Oversharing Baby Pictures on Facebook

Oversharing – that’s what grandmothers do. It’s our job.

No sooner had my granddaughter arrived in the world, I was snapping pictures of the little one wrapped in her warm blanket, in the arms of her loving mother and wearing the cute tutu her cousin gave her. Each picture was promptly posted to my Facebook page to share with my family and friends – all of them begging for more. Careful not to be one of THOSE grandmothers, I paced myself; yet, continuing to post adorable snapshots on a fairly consistent basis. But then my husband says, “Hey, we need to think about the issue of ‘oversharenting.’”  To his point, I guess passing around grandkid photos to your friends over coffee and bridge, as my mother did, and posting pics on Facebook, as I was doing, are two very different things.

The term “oversharenting” was coined by Stephen Leckart who, along with his wife, made the decision to abstain from posting photos of their three-month-old son, as well as staying away from any discussion about their son online. As Lechart wrote in a Wall Street Journal article titled “The Facebook-Free Baby,” “It’s not that I want my son to remain hidden from the world. I just want him to inherit a decision instead of a list of passwords and default settings. If he takes part in social media, he’ll eventually do so on his own terms, not mine.”

Leckart makes an interesting case for letting our children create their own “digital footprint” in life, one defined by them, not by pictures and information living on the Internet that was posted well before the child had any say in the matter. There is also the issue of predators who surf the web for information about children for use in despicable ways. Along with everything else parents have to worry about, exposure of their kids online – even innocently done by grandparents – should now be added to the list. But like everything in life, there’s likely a middle ground here and a few guidelines we should all consider when sharing our lives online:

  • Think twice before posting anything. If you don’t want to see your co-worker’s scantily clad vacation photos, they probably don’t want to see your naked grandbaby learning to crawl for the first time. Ask yourself, “If I were on the other side of the screen, would I want to see this?” It’s the neighborly thing to do.
  • Think about who you are posting these pictures for before you post them. Take the extra time to customize your settings so that only family and close friends can view your photos. Google+ circles and Facebook groups can be created to include only those people with whom you want to share more private, intimate moments with – like grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins and good friends. Save your former colleague from 20 years ago from having to “hide” you.
  • Be a good role model for digital behavior. Be the Girl Scout of social media sharing. It’s okay to show your Facebook friends that you are excited about a new grandchild, but the people who care most probably speak to you on a regular basis. Opt for face-to-face communication in instances that are more private. It’s also the better way to re-kindle any old friendships!  

All in all, just remember to keep your excitement under control. Sharing photos of your loved ones is a great way to connect with family and friends. Just don’t let “oversharenting” overshadow good judgment.

Bookmark and Share
 

Media Relations Do’s and Don’ts

THE BOOZE BIN

By Cassandra Bianco (@cnbianco)

media-relations-wordle

Media relations is a lot like dating. During early conversations of romance, too much contact simmers the sizzle. So why would you reach out to someone, then slam them with a pitch? Which, in fact, is not reaching out, at all. It comes off unnatural, insensitive and forced. When you think about it, cold pitches are basically one-night stands.

I chatted with a few food and beverage buds, who were more than happy to set the record straight. The key pitching takeaways were (1) don’t ever call—pretty much, ever. And (2) don’t “pitch” per se, just include useful information and tips without a gimmicky story idea. Exclusives have a much better response rate than spam. It’s important to be respectful, resourceful and genuine.

Here is a collection of tips from writers Lauren Bloomberg, Angel Antin, and Amy Cao, and from editors Jenny Miller (Grub Street/New York Magazine,) Maggie Hoffman (Serious Eats), Andrea Bartz (Whole Living), and Jacqueline Wasilczyk (Zagat.com).

MEDIA RELATIONS DO’S

  • Do understand what types of stories each media outlet is looking for, and what an editor’s needs are. You will immediately lose the writer’s trust if you don’t tailor your pitch.
  • Do send products along, if the publication doesn’t have a policy against accepting gifts. Staff will happily bust open those samples, and if they really like them, the product will score a placement.
  • Do meet up with media. I spoke to an editor once who told me he never responded to pitches, unless he knew the PR person. I prefer to take an organic approach and attend as many industry events as possible. Make sure to be networking, not “working.” I’ve heard of PR folks getting blacklisted from gatherings because they were always “on.” Remember, you need to prove that you are a resource to journalists. This is earned, not granted.
  • Do offer exclusives that reflect the publication’s need.
  • Do email instead of call. It is never a good time to listen to a pitch over the phone. But, do feel free to call a publication’s main number to find out who your best contact might be.
  • Do keep emails brief. And writers love it when you mention how you came across their article, whether that’s through a friend or via Twitter. Demonstrating that you’re genuinely interested and sharing at least one authentic reason for working together will go a long way.
  • Do go through connections if you have them—you will get a better response rate.
  • Do include the date on every single document you create. Nothing is more frustrating than reading about the rollout of a new product, only to find it happened eight months ago.
  • Do let a writer know if you’re pitching his or her editor. If your pitch catches the writer’s attention, and they turn it in to their editor—who heard about it from you two weeks ago and told you no—then you have just turned a potential contact into a seriously unhappy camper.
  • Do consider the types of sources the outlet requires. Never assume a news outlet accepts PR pros as spokespeople.
  • Do understand a journalist’s obsession with accurate reporting, especially in wine world. Angel Antin elaborated further on this:
Misspellings of crème brûlée keep me awake at night. I write a great deal about the wine industry, and thus have to deal with all those pesky accents on imported wines. I’m indebted to a PR pro who conveys a wine’s correct spelling (with accents), vintage and suggested retail price to me faster than I can spell Gewürztraminer. And I can spell it really, really fast. 

MEDIA RELATIONS DON’TS

  • Don’t make the pitch TOO specific.
  • Don’t send images unless they’re asked for.
  • Don’t send packages without checking in first—addresses change and editorial calendars change, too.
  • Don’t contact media via Twitter. It makes the message receiver feel like they’re being attacked from all sides. Follow-up emails, however, are encouraged. That shows that you are persistent and shows that you’re not just the recipient of a mass email. Do, however, use Twitter as a relationship building tool.
  • Don’t include large attachments, period. Top-tier media receive 500(!) emails per day, most of which are pitches.
  • Don’t suggest a quick meeting before giving info—most journalists are too busy and would prefer all the information up front.
  • Don’t be afraid to email and ask a quick question such as, “what types of stories do you look for?”
  • Don’t pitch made up holidays like “hamburger week.” Your press release will be forwarded to colleagues, and you will be mocked.
  • Don’t target the same person more than about three times. If they don’t respond, they’re probably not interested. When you don’t hear back, it’s time to move on to a different editor.
  • Don’t show up at the writer’s house with a pitch. (True story.)

If you adhere to these tips, you will be a champion.

Bookmark and Share
 

U.VA.’s Transparency Faux Pas

sullivan-addresses-supporters-uva

By Mike Mulvihill

For the past week, Thomas Jefferson’s hallowed University of Virginia, with its long-standing honor code, has been called to task in the media (including daily feature articles in the Washington Post , the Wall Street Journal and many other national media outlets), on the Internet, in social media and by its own faculty, staff, students, alumni and donors.

At the core of the brouhaha are some major gaffs in basic crisis communications protocol.

First, the surreptitious firing of the University’s President Teresa Sullivan, the first woman to ever hold the post, concluded a back channeling campaign by the University Rector that was as transparent as a 19th century brick wall.

Second, the reasons the school’s governing board forced Sullivan out were not made public, so rumor filled the empty space where fact should have been made clear by the people behind her ouster. The general consensus is now that the firing was largely because of Sullivan’s unwillingness to consider dramatic program cuts in the face of dwindling resources and for her perceived reluctance to approach the school with the bottom-line mentality of a corporate chief executive. According to the Wall Street Journal,  it would appear a majority of the board “felt Sullivan lacked the mettle to trim or shut down programs that couldn’t sustain themselves financially, such as obscure academic departments in classics and German.” As the Journal said, maybe the faculty aren’t publishing enough or graduate students not getting jobs. But classics and German — obscure?

Third, the speed of response was pitifully slow – too little, too late. On Monday, nearly a week after firing Sullivan, as the Board met to begin the process of designating an interim president (with 2,000 protestors outside the famed Rotunda building), University Rector Helen Dragas attempted to help defray public pressure by acknowledging the outrage in a statement that expressed regret for how the Board of Visitors handled the leadership transition.

As reported in today’s online issue of the University of Virginia’s student newspaper, The Cavalier Daily, Dragas read a statement saying, “We recognize that, while genuinely well-intended to protect the dignity of all parties, our actions too readily lent themselves to perceptions of being opaque and not in keeping with the honored traditions of this University. For that reason, let me state clearly and unequivocally: you – our U.VA. family – deserved better from this Board, and we have heard your concerns loud and clear.”

This only after the University’s own Faculty Senate met in emergency session to pass a resolution declaring “no confidence” in the Board of Visitors and asking for the resignation of the Rector and Vice Rector of the Board. Meanwhile, major donors have said they would withhold future contributions. And, U.Va.’s own Honor Committee even labeled the Board’s tight-lipped proceedings “troubling.”

Regardless of your pinion of Sullivan’s performance, the universal tone of the outcry from the University family centers on the total lack of transparency exhibited by the Board of Visitors entrusted with oversight of one of the nation’s premiere public universities (#2 in U.S. News and World Reports annual college rankings). In fact, a fair amount of social media from students state they had no relationship with Sullivan, have little idea if she was doing a good job, but support her because of the process followed in her ouster. (If you’re interested, you can find quite a few catty side bars on the whole mess among the Washington Post’s extensive coverage.)

And if all this is about “business-like” behavior, then what is the business sense in harming reputation, alienating donors and creating a crisis that has caused the Board to expend funds to hire NY PR-firm Hill & Knowlton and be on the hook for a severance package for Sullivan, who is two years into a five-year contract with annual compensation of $680,000?

Can I opt for some obscure majors instead?

Photo credit: Richmond Times-Dispatch

Bookmark and Share
 

5 SEO Copywriting Tips

How to write copy that’s friendly to users and search engines.

By Jason Poulos (@TheSaganaki)

iStock_000001638842XSmallA website’s copy has a huge influence on where a site ranks in Google. The most strategically planned out and well built website could fall flat on it’s face if copy isn’t properly crafted and executed. With Google wanting valuable content, the role of web copy and SEO copywriting is becoming more apparent now than ever. If budget isn’t allocate to SEO copywritng or you don’t have a SEO copywriter on staff, you might feel compelled to take this task on yourself. However, this can be quite challenging as I’ve had some excellent writers deliver some really crappy “optimized” copy to myself.

If you are going to write web copy for SEO purposes, here are some copywriting tips:

Incorporate Keywords

It seems like a given but I’ve received SEO copy that didn’t contain any of the targeted keywords that we were trying to rank for. Granted the person writing this copy had little experience but a clear explanation and list of targeted keywords were provided for each page of the site. In general, I recommend that one keyword phrase represents one page on the website. This makes it clear to Google on what you are trying to rank for and will avoid confusion. The targeted keyword will need to get integrated into the content at least 2 to 3 times as long as it naturally fits the copy.

But Don’t Over Incorporate Keywords

As this is called “keyword stuffing.” As content gets crafted with keywords in mind a tendency may arise to over use a particular keyword. SEO copy should not sound repetitive or like a broken record. The content should read naturally to a human and if you have any doubts about your content, try reading it out loud to a coworker. In doing so, both of you will be able to hear any annoyances or repetition in the copy. Trying to force keywords into the copy can penalize the site and hurt rankings. This over optimization penalty can be seen in Google’s most recent Penguin Update.

Add Some Links

In the copy try to contain links to other pages on your website. Google likes this as it signals relevancy between a site’s content. On top of Google, users like links as well as they act as a signal for more information around the linked term(s). Links to external sites aren’t entirely necessary but offer a good way to reference information that you’ve discovered. Linking out to another website’s content might also spawn a reciprocal link back from them. With Google using links back to your site as a popularity measure, any effort towards gaining a quality backlink is a good move.

Don’t Forget About Page Descriptions and Page Titles

serpYes, these elements fall within the copywriting spectrum and are very important to rankings. Most of the time these items are forgotten about as they aren’t found in the main content area of a website but they are found on a Google search results page. Page titles should be keyword rich and contain the site name as well as the page name and should be no longer than 70 characters. Page descriptions should be no longer than 160 characters and should be keyword rich and offer a brief description of the page’s content. Think of the page description and page title like writing copy for an ad as you have a very short time period to grab a user’s attention.

Don’t Ramble and Pontificate

Avoid long lengthy rambling dissertations and try to wrap up your content in about 500 – 750 words. A lot can get said in 500 words and it’s a good number to shoot for when you’re generating copy as this doesn’t look too daunting to a user. If you find that a page’s copy is running long you might need to break the content down into further sub-sections. Remember to stay focused and relative to your specified keywords. Running off on tangents that having nothing to do with the subject matter will just pollute your copy and confuse Google on what you are trying to rank for.

Well, there you have it, 5 sure fire tips that will help the SEO copywriting process.

Bookmark and Share
 

How Communicators Play Doctor: Diabesity and Direction

By April Sciacchitano (@aprilcs)

As health communicators, we liaise between health organizations and the American people.  It’s a huge opportunity because communication is an area of innovation in health. It also means we have more opportunity, if less authority, than medical professionals to help people create healthy lifestyles. The National Center for Health Statistics reported in 2008 that Americans see a doctor an average of four times per year.  As marketers, we “see” people much more often.

In balancing doctor’s orders and corporate wants, we make health information less complex.  But we also need to give it relevance and meaning. Communicators won’t be the cure all, but we do have a lot of power to shape how people understand and interact with their health.

For example, medical professionals have long talked about comorbidities. Medical research is making connections – if you’re obese, you’re more likely to have asthma.  If you have diabetes, you’re more likely to have arthritis.  It’s important that people understand their bodies are systems rather than compartments.  But “comorbid”?  It’s not a good media story, not a good social media campaign, and it’s not going to get anyone’s attention.

But the idea – that it’s all connected, that one illness begets another, is worth considering.  The term “diabesity” communicates comorbidity in a way people understand. I don’t have to explain much about diabesity because it’s there in the name, and that’s the beauty of it.  We need to use or invent the language that achieves this.

In addition, we need to focus on behaviors. The book Switch: How to Change When Change is Hard outlines strategies to change behavior, and points out that they are often environmentally driven habits, rather than hardwired people problems.  For example, if we would reduce our milk-drinking or switch to skim, most of us would no longer surpass the recommended daily intake of saturated fats.  To successfully change habits, a West Virginia public health campaign didn’t ask that we “think about our health” or more specifically “lose wait” or even more specifically “come to a seminar.”  Instead, the campaign gave exact direction:  When you go to the grocery store, choose the milk with the yellow cap instead of the green one.  

How does a brand employ specifics?  Kellogg’s Special K Challenge makes the rules clear.  Replace two meals a day with a Special K meal, treat yourself to two Special K snacks, and have one meal of your choice.  Eat fruits and veggies anytime. For consumers, these rules make the goal “lose weight” into something they can abide by.

As marketers, we need to communicate about health warning signs and wake up calls in digestable terms, and once we have created understanding, we need to tell people exactly what they can do next.  We’re in the position to make the ask. Let’s simplify our messages to help people bring healthy lifestyles home.

Bookmark and Share
 

Avast Booze Marketers! Are Ye Ready for the Perfect Rum Storm?

THE BOOZE BIN

 

By Rosalie Morton @rosaliemo

 

Whiskey is the new “it” beverage. Gin has become the darling of speakeasies and hipsters, with mixologists whipping up Ramos Gin Fizzes, and Hendrick’s Gin finding a plethora of hipster devotees through its pop-up events and seersucker social sponsorships. Bethenny Frankel’s Skinny Girl Vodka has found its way into the liquor cabinets of calorie-counting millennials and desperate housewives everywhere. Patron’s ad campaign touts it as the perfect gift for any party. I’ll drink to that.

 

But what about rum, beverage of choice for Captain Jack Sparrow? Pirates are ever-so-cool these days, but why hasn’t rum been in the spotlight lately? According to a great piece in The Atlantic, rum hasn’t experienced the innovation of other liquors… instead it has experienced consolidation. Overall, the sector is dominated by Bacardi, Diageo (makers of Captain Morgan) and Pernod Ricard (makers of Havana Club). These juggernauts dictate the market’s direction. Small Caribbean island countries each have little producers dominating their own markets and without local competition, there is no need to innovate. Ideas, techniques and products aren’t shared. They export, but their rums are just clones of the big guys. You won’t be seeing a battle for the best premium rum anytime soon.

 

However, we are starting to see some innovation despite these seeming impasses:
- Artisanal Rums: Rum lovers with an entrepreneurial spirit just can’t help themselves, thank goodness. Where the average Joe sees a hopeless situation, these whipper-snappers see opportunity. Take Kelly Railean of Railean Handmade Texas Rum: “Sure, friends and family thought I was crazy to leave my cushy wine job and start up a rum distillery, but my husband and I had a vision” (Examiner.com). Railean, Folly Cove, and 85 Lashes all tout their premium, small batch recipes. But shoo, their creative, web design and branding could use some TLC.
- The Rum Bar: A few of these gems are cropping up here and there across the U.S., featuring large quantities of small batch rums for tasting, as well as the ultimate crowd pleaser… rum punches. Take the punch service at Cana Rum Bar in Downtown L.A. This is not your dad’s Sunday Planter’s Punch. Take, for instance, the “Jitterbug Perfume,” which combines Jasmine-infused Bulleit Rye, Smith & Cross and Coruba Jamaican rums, grapefruit, lime, strawberry and Luxardo Abano. You and up to seven friends will be in for a fun night at $104 (nobody ever said it was easy on the pocket-book!)
From the looks of it, we’re getting ready for the perfect rum storm.
Cana Rum Bar

Cana Rum Bar

 
Artisanal rum makers + popular rum bars focused on single shot tastings + the social aspect of a good rum punch = perfect opportunity for a rum renaissance.
With this resurgence will come better branding for these small distilleries and in turn, more awareness. Plus, we all know Americans like to support the little guy (just like the craft beer movement of late).
Will rum rise above? My guess is yes.

Photo credits: pirates.wikia.com; 85lashes.com; 213nightlife.com

Bookmark and Share